Elon Musk says no primates died as a result of Neuralink’s implants. A WIRED investigation now reveals the grisly specifics of their deaths as US authorities have been asked to investigate Musk’s claims.

  • inspxtr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    1 year ago

    what really confuses me is how the FDA approves this without a few more years of animal testing and protocol refinement.

    • Fixbeat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • inspxtr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        so u’re implying there’s potential corruption? or is there a scenario things are still legal but his (or his people’s) influence is somehow large enough to push it to be approved?

        I really wonder if the FDA publishes the reviews and also the names of the reviewers. The latter may be a stretch and potentially abusive. But the former, if available, might make it easier for outside scientists to further inspect.

    • Zellith@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The people willing to have this implanted do not have brains. Therefore it is safe.

      • inspxtr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        lol I know you’re kidding, but there’s implication of those willing to get things implanted. Society seems to run on hype nowadays. Look at AI and how fast people are jumping on board with trying it, sometimes out of FOMO. Not to say there’s no merit, but if that FOMO feeling spreads real quick, without proper guardrails, Musk will eventually get what he wants.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think many people will get elective brain surgery out of hype. Even if they would they can’t afford it. You mention AI but chatgpt 4.0 is $20 bucks a month. Cost is a big factor in trends.

          Also I am not sure about your qualifier of “nowadays”. Hype isn’t new.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think a big aspect is going to be disability. I don’t think any able bodied people are going to be rushing to get this in their skull, but if I had full body paralysis? Fuck it, why not. Well, aside from then supporting these horrible practices and essentially torture on those poor monkeys…

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait til it does something that employers want. The issue is that this kind of thing can become de facto mandatory.

    • kingthrillgore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      He wants Republicans to win so they’ll gut regulations.