• senoro
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sorry to say that I’m lost on which post you are referring to.

    From what I understand, the original post is an image that says, open a random bible page, do exactly what it says and the last person to end up in jail wins.

    But as the top comment, under which this reply exists, states, if you turned to a random page in the bible you would be unlikely to land on a page which explicitly gives instruction. Which means to me, that you would not be able to turn to a random page and do exactly as stated because you would likely be reading some random story. And obviously the act of reading the story isn’t what I’m talking about, but to act out this story seems difficult, since quite a few of the stories in the bible talk about God or someone divine interfering. How could you act out a divine intervention? You would end up in jail, but not for committing a crime as is implied, however for being a Don Quixoteesque mad man who is acting out stories from the bible.

    I simply don’t understand how this post can be anything other than slander directed at christianity snd the bible, because it’s clear to me that it isn’t possible to act out most stories in the bible. And what’s more, this post, to me, gives off the idea that people who follow christianity must be completely oblivious to the fact that it’s an ancient book and that they must follow everything written in it like it’s their own biological code.

    But if this isn’t what you gather from this post, would you please explain your viewpoint because I am rather confused.

      • senoro
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is my point not valid, that ultimately you cannot go into the bible pick a random page and act it out, it’s physically not possible for a large amount of pages.

        You didn’t even attempt to correct my view although I asked you to explain it if your viewpoint was any different. I genuinely want to know how you see this post if you understand it differently to how I do. Because to me, my understanding is the only one that can logically be drawn from this post.

          • senoro
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you do not want to explain yourself to me then fine, make your single sentence reply that contains 10-20 words saying nothing at all. I gave you everything that I was seeing and you give me “you bad” in return. There is no point in trying to find out more from someone who acts this way.

            • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re mistaking quantity for quality. You were pretending that the scenario was just reading the passage. You were pretending that you didn’t know I was talking about the post I had directly replied to. You are disingenuous and dishonest so as you put it yes “you bad”.