• senoro
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting, I agree with you, my comment was a particularly weak argument. I think the problem with disproving or proving that a god exists, lies with the fact that they/it would presumably lie outside of our universe. And from what we think now we won’t ever be able to escape our universe. Everything that Science says should exist or does exist, lies within our Universe, and we can’t say what lies outside it, and we won’t ever be able to. Which makes the topic of a creator especially difficult to prove/disprove. Following that, I personally still believe that someone who asserts that there is no creator holds it as a belief rather than a fact, although someone else pointed out to me earlier that absence of belief could be called the default. I personally believe that we can’t ever know whether there exists a creator or not, it’s my belief. In my eyes, everything regarding a creator is a belief, because again, I don’t think it’s a thing that is possible to prove or disprove.

    Sorry for the hostility of my earlier comments, I just got carried away, I hope you can understand how that is.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right, if a hypothetical deity exists outside of the universe and does not affect it in any way, that entity would be impossible to detect, by definition. (That entity would also be irrelevant to humans.)

      You might also be interested in the term agnostic:

      a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena

      Some agnostics believe in a god and some don’t, what they agree on is that the truth of it cannot be known.

      Agnosticism is also scientific in nature, because it acknowledges that there are no experimental ways to test the existence of a god.

      And no worries, I didn’t read any hostility in your comments. I enjoy talking about this since I’ve spent multiple decades going over the topic myself.

      • senoro
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I think that everyone must be at least somewhat agnostic, because I think it is human nature to question the logic in what they are told, provided they have the mental capacity to question things (by this I mean as ling as they aren’t a child or mentally developmentally challenged).

        Thank you