Just switched from Plex… but might be going back lol. Http:/localhost :8097 works on my PC where my JF server is hosted. But I can’t connect on any other devices on the same network. What I have tried:

  • enabled private connections in Windows Defender. Then tried public too.

  • went to settings and binded address to 0.0.0.0

  • changed my port from 8096 to 8097 just to see if a different port would work.

  • Made an inbound rule for port 8097 in advanced firewall settings.

Not sure what’s going on here. On Plex it was easy to discover other devices on the same network. I have JF localhost connected to my Cloudflare Tunnel and I have access on all of my devices that way… but I rather just use my internal ip when I’m at home. Any help?

UPDATE: Literally been at this for hours, and as soon as I post the question on Lemmy…I figured it out. 🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️

On Windows, I had to go to settings > networks and internet > and select private network. Don’t know how it was on public. Smh. I’ll leave this here just in case anyone else has the same issue.

  • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1408 months ago

    I always chuckle when I see someone censoring an internal IP. It’s like intentionally not naming the room you’re in (kitchen, bathroom, bedroom, etc) when you’re on the phone so the person on the other end can’t find you on a globe.

    • @dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      478 months ago

      If we pull in a team effort we can all collectively try 1 to 255 for the last octet and download all the money from this man’s bank account and split it between us what say?

      • tj
        link
        fedilink
        148 months ago

        I’m in. We just need 253 more people

        • aard
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          Depends on the network mask.

          • @VonReposti@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -48 months ago

            The 192.168.x.x IP range doesn’t allow for subnet masks greater than 255.255.255.0. How that’s enforced I can’t remember, but I’m 99% sure he isn’t using larger subnets.

            • aard
              link
              fedilink
              English
              58 months ago

              The 192.168.x.x IP range doesn’t allow for subnet masks greater than 255.255.255.0

              This is nonsense. In that space you get a /16, and you can do with it whatever you want.

              • @VonReposti@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -48 months ago

                No it’s not. 192.168.x.x is a reserved class C range which per specification is limited to 255.255.255.0

                • aard
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  28 months ago

                  Stop sprouting that kind of bullshit.

                  Class based networking has been obsolete for 3 decades now - and RfC 1519 was quickly implemented, so pretty much by the mid 90s any device looking up network masks by classes could be considered some broken legacy device.

                  RfC 1918 - which allocates the private IP ranges - came 2.5 years after the introduction of CIDR, specifies the networks in bit notation, and only references what the equivalent networks were in class notation as reference for people who have been asleep for a few years.

            • @SoaringDE@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              The .x.x literally shows that you can fit a /16 (255.255.0.0) in there. 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0

    • @techgearwhipsOP
      link
      English
      88 months ago

      New to selfhosting. Didn’t know any better 🤷🏾‍♂️

        • @techgearwhipsOP
          link
          English
          48 months ago

          Y’all been coming at my neck about this ip address thing. I had to check to make sure I wasn’t back on reddit 😭

  • @ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    95
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You don’t need to put in the effort to hide those IPs. An IP starting with 192.168 is a private network and virtually useless as any way to compromise your network - an outsider would need access to your network (via your modems public facing IP) and know the device access credentials to make any use of the IPs.

    That being said, it appears your input devices are unable to connect because they can’t be found. That means a mismatch in network details somewhere. Check the IP address and confirm it’s using the same subject; does the device connecting use the same 192.168.1.x network as the input/source device?

    • @techgearwhipsOP
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Kind of new to selfhosting. Didn’t know any better 🤷🏾‍♂️

  • R0cket_M00se
    link
    fedilink
    English
    298 months ago

    Any particular reason you felt you needed to blur the last octet? Lol it’s a private IP, outside your broadcast domain and NAT it’s not unique.

    Pretty much every home ISP router is going to hand out IP’s on a class C zero subnet (192.168.0.0/24), if I was trying to fingerprint a network I’d start there anyways but you’d need the public IP for that to even matter.

    • @techgearwhipsOP
      link
      English
      38 months ago

      New to selfhosting. Didn’t know any better 🤷🏾‍♂️

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        I suppose I’m being a little harsh, I just deal in networks and it made me pause but I forget not everyone knows what I know. I apologize for being rude.

        Essentially your internal private network operates on three ranges of numbers depending on your specific needs. Homes usually never need more than a couple dozen but even the most advanced home network probably only uses half a dozen subnets at most and need fewer than 253 devices per, so usually you get 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255/24 because it’s more than enough. The “/24” denotes (out of 32) where the subnet ends, essentially how we are dividing up the allotted space in the IP scheme we are given. The “Class C” range (mentioned above) has an available 65,000+ addresses. Usually more than enough for any way you want to slice it up. Mostly you’ll just see people sling /24’s around because it’s an even interval of 1 in the last octet which makes things simpler.

        People who build more robust “networks” (in the commercial sense) at their houses will usually operate a few different ones, some for internal and others set aside in “DMZ” zones for outward facing servers. Such as gaming servers or self hosting jellyfin!

        • @techgearwhipsOP
          link
          English
          28 months ago

          I read this and got all the way lost in the sauce. Is this English? Lol but for real, I appreciate the info.

          • R0cket_M00se
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            No problem, networks are an interesting development in computer technology and plenty of people (even those with computer knowledge) have never seen how complex they can get.

  • @russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    158 months ago

    I’m assuming both listed IPs are the same IP address? Those are internal IP addresses so you don’t need to censor them.

    Also, is this the Jellyfin app? If so, what happens if you bring up either addresses through a web browser?

  • @deafboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108 months ago

    Back in the windows 2012 era, we knew every time a major windows update was pushed, because the same set of customers would always create a ticket, complaining about inaccessible RDP. Windows firewall is just opinionated like that.

  • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88 months ago

    Regarding your edit and public vs private network:
    Windows really likes to do that.

    Tbh: As soon as I read it, I was assuming it was Windows Firewall related.

  • @JanFedder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    78 months ago

    I hade the same issue recently when I tried jellyfin server on my windows PC. In my case the private/public Windows Firewall setting was not successful.

    But what helped was to open the windows firewall settings and to allow jellyfin do access the privat/public network. You can access the setting by opening the “allowed apps” section in the windows firewall settings.

    Maybe this helps some other folks in the future 😊

  • @Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    CF CloudFlare
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    IP Internet Protocol
    NAT Network Address Translation

    4 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 13 acronyms.

    [Thread #144 for this sub, first seen 17th Sep 2023, 17:45] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • @lal309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48 months ago

    Try through the browser first as suggested by someone else. If you are running the Docker container, check you port mappings.

  • A10@kerala.party
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48 months ago

    Most of the time it would be DNS 😆, glad you figured it out, I have been in your situation before. Just a heads up! Cloudflare TOS does not allow video streaming unless you are a paid customer, they could ban you if you stream a lot through CF. I got away with less than 4GB per month.

    • @techgearwhipsOP
      link
      English
      28 months ago

      Yea, I doubt I’ll ever use my Cloudflare ip address unless sim out on vacation. Internal ip 99% of the time.

  • @phx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    I’ve had windows do this to me randomly before, especially if it’s an interface that comes up a bit late. Be careful that it doesn’t change back on you

  • @doubletandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    you may try this: 1/make sure jellyfin is actually running and there is no error in logs and firewall is not blocking inbound connections

    2/double check LAN IP/port jellyfin service running on and make sure the device you want to connecting to jellyfin can reach that IP (simple icmp ping is a good start)

  • badgrandpa69
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    I had that issue, but don’t remember what I did to fix it lol