• otacon239@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just want to be able to buy something like an Oculus CV1 without Oculus software/proprietary hardware and a nicer screen. I’m still rocking the same unit I got several years ago and it’s still plenty fine for most things.

    All of the fancy things like wireless and no-tower tracking are nice, but I imagine a lot of players are going to be seated and just want the immersion. Why not have a $300-400 offering that does this?

    • maxprime
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I could be wrong on this since I have no source but I always assumed that Oculus headsets were cheap because they’re a Meta product and you’re actually paying for it with your data/telemetry.

      Like, the ungodly amount they spent on VR R&D is absolutely not being made up for by the few hundred dollar price tag on their headsets — I bet that barely covers the cost of materials. That must be for a reason.

    • Dudewitbow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean isnt this why people bought the HP Reverb?

      Its partially a self inflicted problem if you need Valve to do it.

    • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why not have a $300-400 offering that does this?

      I think having base stations not only increases price but also makes it unapproachable for a vast majority of people. Personally, I didn’t even consider the CV1 or the Index because I just didn’t have a room that could properly accommodate them. For the sitting use case, no-tower tracking is actually very suitable and probably works better.