fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoOpenAI confirms that AI writing detectors don’t workarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1703arrow-down133cross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1670arrow-down1external-linkOpenAI confirms that AI writing detectors don’t workarstechnica.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square109fedilinkcross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zip
minus-squarePetDinosaurs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·1 year agoIt almost certainly has some gan-like pieces. Gans are part of the NN toolbox, like cnns and rnns and such. Basically all commercial algorithms (not just nns, everything) are what I like to call “hybrid” methods, which means keep throwing different tools at it until things work well enough.
minus-squarestevedidWHAT@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoThe findings were for GAN models, not GAN like components though.
It almost certainly has some gan-like pieces.
Gans are part of the NN toolbox, like cnns and rnns and such.
Basically all commercial algorithms (not just nns, everything) are what I like to call “hybrid” methods, which means keep throwing different tools at it until things work well enough.
The findings were for GAN models, not GAN like components though.