• zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems more likely that there would be hobbies that sound boring but are actually exciting.

    • argh_another_username@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know. For example, astrophotography seems interesting when you see amazing pictures of distant galaxies and stuff. But the actual process of taking thousands of photos and processing them seems super boring to me. Actually, any kind of photo post processing I find super boring. For years I used Lightroom in my photos. Now, I can’t do that shit anymore.

      • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It depends on what you like, and how you do it.

        Once you start to get serious, a lot of it is almost automated. You connect a video camera to your telescope, set the telescope to track whatever you’re trying to image, and batch process the frames into a final image. There’s still lots to do, but the boring parts are not too bad.

        I find the setting up and tweaking interesting too though, so I might be biased :D

      • laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, I was into regular photography, well the boring and hard branch of photography called bird photography and even I struggled with astrophotography.

        It really feels like you can either not buy much equipment and struggle with moving the camera a tenth of a millimeter every 3 minutes or you buy an eq mount and hook up your camera to your laptop and come back after a 7 hours nap to a neat pile of pictures that don’t really show anything but after 4 hours of automated processing and some manual retouching show something about 80% good as Hubble. Which is nice, but it’s not exactly something unique. And the extra annoying thing is the only way you get better is by investing more money.

        At least in bird photography once you’ve got the 600mm f/4 for 10k you’re set for life.

          • laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah but if you want to switch from photographing birds to airplanes or fuckin lions or something you don’t need to change literally anything.

            If an astrophotography invested 10k into DSO wants to take pictures of the sun, they’d need more equipment. Want to do lunar imaging, new stuff. Solar system objects, new stuff. Eclipse new stuff. Comets new stuff.

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The process may be boring, but I assume the end result or discovering anything interesting would be exciting.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Somebody did that thread a little bit ago, this, presumably, is the follow-up thread in response to it.

    • Anticorp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That question was already asked a couple of days ago and I’m assuming this is the follow-up question.