• Maeve@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Oh my god, that person questioned my narrative about “x” they must be whomever I’m othering because I’m insecure and it’s easier to take trash than deeply reflect why. I’m going to label them that, that’ll teach them.” Please. 🥱

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love it when they burst into a rant about how easily offended others are when you call them out on ‘banning’ (blocking) a sub for having a meme they didn’t like, lmao.

        • bucho@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s even more hilarious 'cause I got banned from one of the tankie subs for asking the idiot I was arguing with if he got dropped on his head as a baby. They flagged that as “ableism” and kicked me out. LOL. Hypocritical, crybaby removed.

                • bucho@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, they banned you for having a funny username, and they banned me for asking if someone was dropped on their head as a baby. They’re crybaby removed.

                  As for sources, I’m assuming most of that was posted after I was banned and could no longer reply. The only one I remember ignoring completely was one dummy who posted some hour long justification piece by Lukashenko, and like… I’m not about to waste my time listening to a dictator talking shop.

                  As for my penchant for insulting people… yeah. I don’t suffer fools gladly. It’s just not in me. So I amuse myself by telling them precisely what I think of them without couching the language.

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I knew that would be twisted but left it. I’ll be more precise: authoritarianism is authoritarianism, but I don’t know enough about their other perspectives to say they’re no good. Perhaps an exchange of ideas may bring two or more perspectives closer. Maybe not.

              • Maeve@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because i see how this works. You’re not better than them, you’re doing the same thing they complain about, and so far, that’s what authoritarians do. I forget a lot about tankie things that I don’t understand, because they’re usually banned, shouted down, etc. You keep showing your insecurity in my inbox, have the last word and feel smug. You’re so sure about your ideas, you can’t tolerate me entertaining otherwise. Maybe I’d come to the same conclusion for myself if I can’t let that happen because it’s not possible to hear from them. I used to defend freedom of speech for Nazis too, but I learned. I also learned about psyops of everyone from cliques to governments, including inflation and band wagon.

                • bucho@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  you’re doing the same thing they complain about, and so far, that’s what authoritarians do

                  I’m sorry; did you just compare some asshole shitposting online with an authoritarian? Are you actually stupid? Do you just not know what authoritarianism is?

                  Maybe I’d come to the same conclusion for myself if I can’t let that happen because it’s not possible to hear from them

                  Yeah. I think you might legitimately be stupid. You know you can go check out any Tankie spaces on Hexbear or Lemmy.ml any time you want, right? Like, a couple instances defederating from them doesn’t in any way silence them. They’re still free to post their garbage opinions on their own instances.

                  I used to defend freedom of speech for Nazis too

                  Ok, yup. You’re legitimately stupid.

                  Why are you still here, again?

                  • Maeve@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ow oooh owwww I’m going to wither and die because someone on the internet felt threatened by a different perspective and rather than have legit rebuttal attacked like they accuse tankies of doing.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You think you’re entitled to our attention?

      There’s only so much time and effort people are willing to spend failing to educate willfully moronic reactionaries.

      If you morons won’t learn, add nothing of value, and insist on polluting lemmy with your nonsense, why would we not just block or defederate you?

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yet you’re willing to give attention to hurl epithets.

        Block or defederate me? Rofl. Or communists who checks notes gave us the platform? “You morons” ah yes, thanks for reminding me I’m part of the group you’re insulting, maybe they put their viewpoints on the platform they created? I don’t see you signing up for truth social and doing the same thing; perhaps they’re not as authoritarian in some ways as say… you

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolute word salad.

          Tankies aren’t communists - they’re red-fascist dogs that don’t care about worker enfranchisement.

          You can fuck off now.

          • Maeve@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            What? Ofc they are. Are you conflating “authoritarian” with “fascists?”

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Depends. If a government is oppressive to civil rights and punishes dissent, but they’re a rival/adversary of the US, do they get a pass for that?

              A tankie would say yes, because they’re too blinded by anti American sentiment to think objectively. Generally speaking, a tankie will defend the Chinese government’s censorship, for instance.

              • Maeve@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                think the problem is the psychological and political definition of “right wing authoritarian” are very different, but we (including myself) don’t know or forget, and also don’t define our terms at outset. Thanks for your reply. Btw I’ve always been dubious of “enemy of my enemy = friend.”