• anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      A faschist with a red flag.

      The term origenaly referred to lefties that supported the Soviet Union rolling tanks into nations protesting for democracy.

      Modern tankies defend historical “communist” states and their successer states like Russia. They can often be seen glorifying dictators and denying genocides.

      • WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well described, actually. And most of the tankies can be fought with actual knowledge of Marxism and socialism, since they try to pass themselves as all-so-knowledgeable of them and then spew the worst kind of misunderstandings of the socialist theories. Pseudo-intellectual edgy teenage-minded dumb-dumbs, in a nutshell

        • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I discovered you can score extra points where you deconstruct their argument to the point where they’ll call you a “debate pervert” and ragequit the fediverse

          Thing is, they’ll have so much unread communist literature around their home they’re bound to come back. Much easier to jump back into the bearbubble than read those big, big books

          • WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You don’t even need the big big books. All you need is both Marx and Engels to knock their bad understanding out of them.

            My favorite cope that they invoke is that Lenin and Stalin’s communism wasn’t real communism. My tankie, according to Engels, they actually followed the “state capitalism” scenario to the letter, by having the state hold monopoly over the means of production, planning themselves like a corporation and owning the markets, the only difference being that the soviet states did not run on profit. Engels

        • socsa
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I love getting fashsplained that I would surely understand Lenin’s points more clearly if I only read more Chomsky.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not really, cause any comment you make towards them, they just deflect and focus on something else.

          Like typical conservative agents… There is no debating with them, because you will never convince them that you are right. that they are wrong, or that there is any middle ground (and even if you did concede a middle ground, it would be their victory) They will just amuse themselves exhausting you, and declare themselves a victor when you give up.

          Its literally no different than trying to wrestle pigs in shit.

          Only the pig is wearing a red shirt with hammer and sickle on it, while saying Putin is saving the world from Ukraine.

      • OldPain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well put. They’re another online cult where you just have to scratch your head and wonder how the hell they came to certain conclusions.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Authoritarian leftists. Stalinists, basically. The kind of people who look at protests being crushed by tanks and say “Good, those reactionary civilian pigs deserved it!”

      • Astro@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Authoritarian Leftists seems to be an oxymoron

        Edit: I meant sounds like; I’m super dumb lol. Thanks for educating me on what it actually means :)

        • Kata1yst@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Liberalism and authoritarianism are opposites just like progressivism and conservatism are.

          For historical (and arguably nefarious) reasons Western society has largely lumped liberalism and progressivism into “Left” and authoritarianism and conservatism into “Right”.

          But this ignores the reality that you can have progressive authoritarians (Stalinists/Maoists), and liberal conservatives (Libertarians).

          • Slotos@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Either you’re using a definition of “progressive” that doesn’t relate to progressivism, or we’re looking at some very different definitions of Stalinism.

            Stalinism was never about improvement of human societies. One could argue that Trotskyism was at least pretending to (it’s incredibly hard to attribute real humanitarian intent to anything bolsheviks did, once you look closer at their methods), but Stalinism was unabashedly explicit about seizing control and shutting down dissent. It embraced Russian Empire’s secret police approach and was closer to early Muscovite monarchism, with a despot deciding who gets to enjoy privileges and control, than to anything progressive.

            • Kata1yst@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What you’re talking about is the “authoritarian” part of the progressive authoritarian equation.

              As the opposite of conservatism, progressivism is about societal advancement, elevating the average well being in the country, which on it’s face Communism is explicitly about. Or are you arguing that Stalinist Communism was conservative, trying to uphold the values of the historical ruling power structures?

              • Slotos@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Authoritarianism explicitly opposes political action, attempting to eradicate it entirely. Progressivism is rooted in it.

                Conservatism is not defined by “upholding the values of the historical ruling power structures”. A dog being wet doesn’t make everything that’s wet a dog.

                Stalinism in practice was extremely backwards, ironically anti-communist, and conservative with its strict vertical power structure (traditional for Russian empire) and promotion of Russian nationalism (Stalin explicitly names Russians as “elder brothers of soviet people”). Stalin’s authoritarian approach also agrees with conservatives’ preference for strict social order models. Political activism was persecuted under Stalin in the same manner - and often by the same people - it was persecuted in Russian empire.

                The founding myth of the empire - “Kyiv is the mother of Russian cities and Russia is the Rus” was not only preserved, but actively maintained through any means possible. Can’t get more conservative than that.

    • mycorrhiza they/them
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m too tired and busy tonight to make a case here, but I would just point out that lemmy.world has defederated from anyone who can explain to you what a tankie believes and why, and you are only getting one side of the story in this thread.

      I think most Americans who lived through the Iraq war are aware that America lies, but still not aware of the extent of it. The main targets of those lies are socialist states. When the intent of the lies is to make socialist states look monstrous, anyone who claims otherwise gets smeared with the same brush: a defender of monstrous states. It’s a rhetorical firewall.

      If you want to know what tankies believe and why, you should ask them. Whether you find them persuasive or not, you’ll at least have learned what a subset of the human population believes and it will round out your perspective on the world.

      The two main lemmy instances where you can find tankies are hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml. Hexbear is larger and more active, and their range of perspectives is a little broader because they include anarchists. Hexbear’s list of federated instances is here https://hexbear.net/instances, and lemmygrad’s is here https://lemmygrad.ml/instances.

        • kaonashi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          just say you don’t know what imperialism is (it’s not when countries resist the largest imperial sphere in the history of earth), i can recommend some reading material