As Ukrainian submarine drones strapped with explosives approached the Russian fleet, they “lost connectivity and washed ashore harmlessly,” Isaacson writes.

This sounds like treason to me. This needs to be investigated, we can’t have a private citizen fucking the Ukrainians like this.


EDIT: Musk admits to it: https://sh.itjust.works/post/4649482

  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been seeing this a lot, but do they have a particular reason they would be able to nationalize starlink? Was there some sort of contract or investment that gives them stakes in it?

    • dragontamer@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’d be an extreme action. But during wartime, USA has the right to nationalize our companies in the name of defense.

      I’m not particularly keen on the details, you’d probably have to ask a lawyer over these details. But USA nationalized companies like GM during the 2008 crisis, for an example. So we don’t actually have to go back too far into history to see this kind of extreme action being taken. Single decades, not even multiple decades.


      I dunno if nationalizing Starlink makes the best sense… yet. At a minimum, this has proven that Starlink is an unreliable partner as a wartime satellite internet provider however. Ideally, we can just rebuild our investments in other companies / alternative satellites and avoid SpaceX as a peg in our defense plan.