• Iceblade@lemdit.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    11$/month is 132$/yr. That’s a significant anount ofmoney - about the same as my car insurance, broadband or phone bill. Putting a bunch of good music in a playlist and letting it roll is nice enough, especially with a 3rd party app to mute ads automatically. Besides, I don’t feel sorry for Spotify. The reason they’re hemorrhaging money isn’t a lack of profitability, but due to the massive royalties going to record companies.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      For the median American that works full-time, who earns around $56,000, the cost of Spotify is 0.2% of their income.

      Obviously everyone is in their own financial situation and for some people that will still be a burden. But for sake of comparison, in 1989, the average cost of cable TV was $18, and that’s of course in 1989 dollars. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say that $11 for unlimited access to basically all music at any time is a pretty good value for the money.

      That said, if it is still onerous to someone, they’re obviously not in ideal circumstances and I’m really not gonna fault them for just pirating.

      • Iceblade@lemdit.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Swedish student (Median full-time wage here is 35’790 USD equivalents before an avg ~30% payroll tax), not taking loans, working part time teaching (and occasionally nursing) to make ends meet, so yeah, pretty cash strapped atm.

        Also, note that I already do have access to all the music in the world for free via youtube if I want something specific, or spotify for “radio style” infinite listening. 1440SEK/132USD is for added conveniences. No real need to pirate anything.