Bloodyashes@lemm.ee to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agoNow you have to pay to see lyrics on spotifyi.postimg.ccimagemessage-square185fedilinkarrow-up1553arrow-down114cross-posted to: wolnyinternet@szmer.info
arrow-up1539arrow-down1imageNow you have to pay to see lyrics on spotifyi.postimg.ccBloodyashes@lemm.ee to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square185fedilinkcross-posted to: wolnyinternet@szmer.info
minus-squareredfellow@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoAnd that’s trusting that whoever uploaded the track had a good quality source. And it’s still double encoded.
minus-squarePulp@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAny official uploads from recent years are going to be just fine. And if not then maybe their spotify upload is broken too
minus-squareredfellow@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoHq is equivalent to 320kbps, noticably better than YT quality
minus-squareඞmirlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWell if you save the opus or aac it’s only single lossy compression, not double unless the uploader used a lossy file as their input. But if that was the case, ripping mp3 would be triple lossy compression…
And that’s trusting that whoever uploaded the track had a good quality source. And it’s still double encoded.
Any official uploads from recent years are going to be just fine. And if not then maybe their spotify upload is broken too
Hq is equivalent to 320kbps, noticably better than YT quality
Well if you save the opus or aac it’s only single lossy compression, not double unless the uploader used a lossy file as their input. But if that was the case, ripping mp3 would be triple lossy compression…