Starfield and Baldur’s Gate 3 both weigh the player down with encumbrance. Love it or hate it, it seems like it’s here to stay.

  • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not “here to stay” it’s a feature that is used or not used depending on the level of realness wanted. Some are fine with hand waving away encumbrance, some are not.

    If you’re playing a walking simulator, it is kinda part of the immersion.

    If you’re running around killing every Greek god under the Sun, but suddenly you pick up your 7th weapon that’s just chains with something at the end of it, and BOOM you can’t move anymore cuz your too heavy, then it’s getting in the way. Instead of implementing encumbrance they just, limit you to 6 weapons and tada, they could explain it as “it’s too much weight” but they won’t give you the option for it to happen as slowing you down would kill the pace and feel of the game.

    Baldurs gate is a DND based CRPG and Starfield is a loadscreenwalking simulator. Of course they have encumbrance.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Baldurs gate is a DND based CRPG

      Although DND games usually handwaive encumbrance with bags of holding.

      • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fair, depends on the game. CRPG’s will tend to have it in. I mean for example WotR and Kingmaker you can get a bag of holding if you buy it or put stuff into strength on characters or etc in order to not have to worry about it much but it’s still there, and not spending the money on it or building any characters with strength means you will be limited.

      • Dee@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        bags of holding.

        It’s true. The character in my current campaign has two bags of holding and a bag of devouring.

    • RickRussell_CA@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      And you’ve got KOTOR and Pillars of Eternity and others that are clearly D&D derivatives, but solve the problem handily with a “stash” whose contents are never accessible in combat.

      I have never understood the fascination with inventory management. I just want to find stuff, and use that stuff later on. If I wanted something as boring as my actual job, I’d just do my actual job and get paid for it instead of buying a game.

      • Schlock@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        In BG3 it is a balance mechanic. Heavy objects tend to be completely OP and are used to cheese combat. encumberance limits this and even allows building your character specifically for this playstyle.

        In Bethesda games encumberance is in part there to protect players from themselves. If every object can be picked up (and that is a design principle in those games) and every object has a Value, then the optimal strategy is always to grab every single object you can find and then sell everything at once. If that does not sound like fun to you that is because it is not, but still i know multiple people who play those games this way even with encumberance in place. Players will always find a way to ruin their own fun, the only hing you can do is to put systems in place that disincentivise these behaviors.

        • leftzero
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Heavy objects tend to be completely OP and are used to cheese combat.

          You shut up. Barrelmancy and goblin tossin’ are perfectly legitimate martial arts!

        • RickRussell_CA@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          A “stash” that is only accessible outside combat mostly preserves that balance, IMO.

          Most games come up with a range of ways to get around the problem, even when they do have a strictly limited inventory with encumbrance:

          • Zero weight quest items

          • Ability to run or fast travel while encumbered (FO4 selectable perk)

          • A pet or NPC capable of carrying your less valuable stuff back to the vendor for sale (Torchlight had this, did Diablo? I haven’t played in decades.)

          • Pack animals/robots

          • Portable vendors (Skyrim had a demon vendor you could summon once a day)

          • Bags of holding (or similar)

          • Warp chests (many chests with same contents/inventory around map)

          etc. ad infinitum. The fact that most games implement a variety of ways to deal with absence of an infinite inventory is kind of a tipoff that it’s more of a burden than a desirable aspect of gameplay. Most of these games are holding up a carrot (or several) to get you to pursue certain achievements just to reduce the monotony of inventory management.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just because you don’t like inventory management doesn’t mean others don’t.

        as boring as my actual job

        Again, subjective, considering the popularity of job simulator games, like truck sim.