• Grant_M@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lazy game devs should release finished optimized products.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How to say you know nothing about game development without saying you know nothing about game (software) development. But want to assert your opinion on it regardless.

      It’s corporate profiteering not lazy devs. The devs work their asses off, these aren’t their decisions to make.

      It’s like blaming the guy finishing the drywall for design problems with the building. Lazy drywallers, ruining a good office tower, it wouldn’t be leaning if they weren’t so lazy.

      • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The more people defend the lazy game devs, the more crappy half finished games we will get. The reason people need to seek out upscaling at all for Starfield is because the game isn’t optimized. Lazy design.

        • Daevan@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or bad resource allocation by the management. If they cut performance development in favour of marketing what a developer can do?

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I like that you are so unwilling to learn that you associate an explanation of a field you know nothing about as “defending”

          😂😂