The landlord had told them he wanted to raise the rent to $3,500 and when they complained he decided to raise it to $9,500.

“We know that our building is not rent controlled and this was something we were always worried about happening and there is no way we can afford $9,500 per month," Yumna Farooq said.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    106
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ya. It sounds like they wanted to raise the rent to $3500 which the landlord clearly thought was being reasonable for this building. They removeded about it so the landlord raised the rent high enough to get rid of them.

    Sounds like the gambled and lost. Instead of going to the news, they should have tried to negotiate back to $3500 or something close. Good luck now.

      • ddkman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        76
        ·
        1 year ago

        This really depends. If the building is rentable for 5000 than it is. Like it or not.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If 2500 was reasonable back then, then it still is reasonable right now.

          Unless gigantic upgrades were performed to the house that warrant a 1000 price hike, which I highly doubt.

          Just because the market is fucked doesn’t mean you get to make the market even worse.

          • ddkman@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Except the price of food building materials renovation costs went up by about 100% where i live realistically. So a landlord isn’t going to just take the fact that their 2500 whatever is now only worth 1700 whatevers.

          • Rocket@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If accepting a lease on a post-2018 construction, knowing that no rent control was in force, was reasonable then, it is still reasonable now. Live with your choices.

            • cazsiel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This isn’t living with ones own choices. This is having others choices thrust into you and having to deal with their greed.

              • Rocket@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                There is no obligation to enter into a tenancy knowing that the landlord can jack the prices up on a whim. There is plenty of choice – one can opt to move into a unit constructed before 2018 instead, or, in newer construction, one can make it a contractual condition of the tenancy to have an independently negotiated “rent control” in force.

                To ignore all of that at the time and then cry about it later because the risk taken didn’t work out is just plain antisocial behaviour. We invented contract law exactly to prevent these kinds of surprises. If you want to play some other stupid game instead, expect to win stupid prizes.

            • erg@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              having no rent control is never reasonable. People only accepted places without rent control because all other options are shit too

              • Rocket@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Exactly. To accept a lease on a property that you know doesn’t have automatic rent control, and to not contractually obligate the landlord to long-term price controls in that rental agreement, is reckless. They took the high risk gamble and lost. Such is life. But to then complain that their high risk scheme, which was done to screw over other renters who are more careful, didn’t work out is plain antisocial behaviour.

        • MisterScruffy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          You like profiting from others misery. It’s not illegal and it’s not generally even frowned upon but it’s still shitty and you have to own it

        • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          You realize that there’s people living in these apartments right? You know there’s a housing crisis right now that’s fueled by housing investors from all over the world and shit like Airbnb and corporate greed, right?