• Joris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      At least google sites recommending Chrome are free to use. Microsoft is forcing is it’s useless browser to an audience via an OS. Which they paid for. Two huge no-no’s.

      • HughJanus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        MS should just quit the facade and make it free.

        I mean it more or less already is. I’m running an unregistered W10 Pro and the “activate license” thing only comes up occasionally.

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I heard from an acquaintance of mine that works for MS that they really don’t care if you pay for their software. As long as you’re using it, they know you’re locked into their environment.

          Hell, you can download an install ISO off their website directly, and you can install and run it without a license key.

          • HughJanus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I think that much is really apparent. I use AtlasOS when I absolutely need to use Windows.

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, they are doing both. The list of entities covered by the DMA dropped today.