Access Restricted
www.wowktv.com

“I went to hug him because he was upset, and next thing I know they just yelled ‘Jason!’ and they ‘pow, pow, pow, pow, pow,'” Odell said. “I about got shot. I felt the compressions of the bullets. It was horrible.”

      • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
        7·
        2 years ago

        no see obviously, if you do any crime it’s automatically valid to then extrajudicially murder you even if you’re just existing, lol. we at some point started living in judge dredd rules, i guess

        • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
          7·
          2 years ago

          This headline makes it sound like the police just rolled up and shot some random dude for no reason, which is disingenuous

          except they literally did do that, lol. i’m not sure why we’re trying to justify this here, exactly:

          “He [Jason] just took his dad out and put him in the car [hearse], carried the casket out, and he came over and I was hugging him, and next thing I know, somebody yelled ‘Jason!’ and then, you know, ‘boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom,'” Odell said. “He didn’t have a chance to do nothing.”

          Odell said she was hugging Jason when he was shot.

          “I went to hug him because he was upset, and next thing I know they just yelled ‘Jason!’ and they ‘pow, pow, pow, pow, pow,'” Odell said. “I about got shot. I felt the compressions of the bullets. It was horrible.”

            • Whom@beehaw.org
              6·
              2 years ago

              I don’t care if he had an AK strapped to his back, this murder is unjustifiable.

              We all have the context and still feel this was wrong. I assure you, it isn’t a kneejerk reaction.

                • Whom@beehaw.org
                  6·
                  2 years ago

                  No, it would not be enough, and I don’t only say this because the police shouldn’t exist in the first place. What’s more important is that they have a right to a fair trial just like anyone else. If there are literally any options to stop him from doing harm without killing him, they first need to be taken. And given that he was in his sister’s arms (it’s unclear if it was his sister or aunt to my reading, given that “the deceased” now refers to two of them) and not, yknow, holding the funeral goers hostage, there were still options.

                • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgOPM
                  5·
                  2 years ago

                  The context of when and how he was shot are both incredibly important. Do you think it’s okay for police to shoot a non-violent, unarmed suspect?

            • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
              3·
              2 years ago

              They absolutely did not, and it’s disingenuous to pretend that they did. From the article:

              neither “having a warrant for [his] arrest” nor “previously committing a crime” are a justification for shooting someone (especially not before they’ve actually been tried for the alleged crime they’re being arrested on) and i know for a fact you know that because committing a crime is not punished in any sane country by summary execution before trial. for someone throwing around the word “disingenuous”, you are very obviously ignoring the inconvenient circumstances of what you’re trying to defend in trying to run defense here for cops capitally punishing someone for no reason.

                • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
                  4·
                  2 years ago

                  i just want to point out: this is a really funny thing to say to someone who is literally an admin on the instance you’re on right now. i don’t mean to condescend here, genuinely, but maybe this instance is not for you if you find yourself doing this.

        • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgOPM
          5·
          2 years ago
          • This context is in the article
          • This context does not excuse the action
          • Nothing about the title above is not true
          • Please answer the question
                • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgOPM
                  3·
                  2 years ago

                  Your justification is framed through the eyes of ‘I don’t know what happened’ and we need an ‘investigation’, the question I was asking was establishing a specific way in which a suspect was shot and asking for your opinion on it. I’m curious to your thoughts on this specific use case, because I’m curious under what circumstances you think it’s okay to shoot someone suspected of a crime.

                • Chris Remington@beehaw.org
                  3·
                  2 years ago

                  Christ

                  Persons of a religious persuasion, particularly Christians, may be offended by your use of this word.

                  this place is a circle jerk

                  Are you accusing us here? Personally, I don’t believe this place is the right fit for you. Would you mind leaving Beehaw voluntarily?