• Clav64
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    1 year ago

    Medium.com is absolutely rotten for this behaviour.

    Not only putting the soft, “sign in to view” but then on some articles requiring a full hard paywall… But you only know this after signing in.

    I’m not entirely against charging for well written articles; good writers deserve compensation, but don’t tease me, make me jump through a hoop only to find there’s another much higher hoop sitting beyond it.

    • Andy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve just cancelled my Medium subscription. I was finding myself going there less and less. So many articles saying the same thing in various levels of broken English.

          • x4740N@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Libredirect doesn’t check and update working instances, if I recall correctly with libredirect you have to manually add instances to the list and can only ping the provided ones manually

            There’s a few userscripts on greasyfork for it as well

            You can also use farside on browsers that don’t support userscripts just by modifying a url

            It has been particularly useful for browsing reddit pages without actually going to reddit because I’m not going to give spez my data and libreddit instances sometimes max out on requests so I just have to close and open tabs until I have a working instance

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Surely that’s down to the author though? Most Medium articles I’ve read are completely free and unrestricted.

      • Clav64
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have no idea. But my gripe is the lack of a clear notice that “this is a paid article and you must be paid member to view it”, it just says words to the effect “sign in to view”.

      • hactar42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Here lately it feels like Medium has started their road to enshitification. I’ve been noticing them locking more and more content lately.

      • scurry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A bit over a year ago, I tried writing on Medium, and what I found was no, not really anyway. Medium was putting the soft paywall on all of my posts, without me asking or benefiting from it other than hosting, though I could choose to make them hard paywalled. It was my impression at the time that they would only let you unpaywall your articles on there if you paid them that ransom, instead of every reader (by being a member). You could argue that the authors choose to post there when there are alternatives anyway, so it’s still on the authors (and I do).

        • lawrence@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thank you very much for the information. I always found it strange that Stack Overflow and Experts Exchange are so similar, yet have such different business models.

      • Z4rK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For your consolation, many “answers” there are poor and just copy pasted from some open website anyway.

        You have to realize that their business model is marking questions as answered so that they can paywall access and lure people in. This might affect their quality control…

        • FireWire400@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s ok, I found a solution to my problem soon afterwards and I think their solution is most likely just some general troubleshooting stuff anyway. I wonder if the original poster even ‘certified’ the solution at all or if that’s just part of the site’s paywall-scheme.

          What surprises me is that this site has been doing this for a long time apparently, I always thought putting paywalls in front of everything was more of a web3.0 thing.

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        No shock there. They have been that way since 2007. It is why the SpiceWorks community took so much.

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used to block search results from that site for this very reason. I don’t seem to ever get anything from them anymore though.

        • FireWire400@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I had never heard of it before coming across this, this is the first time I’ve seen a paywall over what essentially is a forum post

          • fiat_lux@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            They used to be very big and dominated search results for various technical information, before stackoverflow was a thing. It was so infuriating when the only possible clue to your niche bug was an experts-exchange paywall. And that happened a lot for way too long, after it went bankrupt and was bought by venture capitalists.

            I’m so very glad they’re mostly irrelevant now, they made the early 2000’s internet more painful than it needed to be.

        • b000urns@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          How? 🙏 Years back there was an option is Google SERPs to do it… until they removed it 🙄

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    Usually it’s shit advice anyway, so it’s not like you’re actually missing out. Of course they want you to think so, wanting your money, but back in the day when this was “expertsexchange” (snrk) evading the paywall was… easy, but still not worth it. That is how shit it was.

    Just find better sources: Google has recently been even more blatant about pushing “good for us”-results above “actually good” results, so trying another engine might help, too.

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I stopped saying “google it” and started saying “search the internet” when I switch to Qwant.

      • L'unico Dee@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Qwant is just a bing frontend with a bit better privacy, bit they still share some infos:

        Why are you transferring data to Microsoft, and what data is it?

        Microsoft provides some of the search results you see on our pages, and provides ads to the keywords in your search inquiry. This means that we need to send Microsoft some information related to your search that allows our partner to return results and ads relevant to that search, and to prevent fraudulent clicks or other activities that are not permitted by our Terms of Use.

        In order to detect fraud, Qwant uses a specialized service offered by Microsoft, which does not have access to the keywords of your search. Only your IP address and the browser (your “User Agent”) are communicated to this specialized service to calculate a fraud probability score. Keywords are sent separately to another service that does not know your IP address.

        Source

        PS: The results are Bing’s so they are biased

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s true but I preferred their results over ddg when I compared. I might try swisscows again.

  • DrQuint@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It should be illegal to gate content made by users with a registration.

    Not the case with Medium, they have, uh, “volunteer” writers. But point stands.

  • Carlos Solís@communities.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Mildly” infuriating is an understatement, that is downright predatory behavior. Shelling out money you may or may not have in order to find a potential answer to an urgent problem you currently have is high in the list of scumbag moves. In related topics, why does the same thing happen often in regards to mental health support online?

  • kylian0087@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Redhat does this as well a loaf. And even when logged in. A ton of awnsers you need a active subscription for.

  • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Redhat site really makes me angry sometimes. This is in the ‘going to write me a mini-van’ territory (that is a Dilbert quote, not sure if that works anymore). Write annoying things into your product and put the answers behind paywalls.