silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agoDeSantis Rejected $350 Million in Climate Funding Before Hurricane Idalia | Now his state is suffering from a storm fueled by climate change.newrepublic.comexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1368arrow-down16
arrow-up1362arrow-down1external-linkDeSantis Rejected $350 Million in Climate Funding Before Hurricane Idalia | Now his state is suffering from a storm fueled by climate change.newrepublic.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squaresilence7@slrpnk.netOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoNot to any meaningful degree: the heating from CO2 emitted when your burn coal for energy is about 100000x more than the heat produced from the burning. That’s why the big action which needs to happen is to stop burning fossil fuels.
minus-squareMisterD@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI was thinking about heat pumps. 300% efficiency They are electric and could be carbon negative depending on the source of electricity
minus-squaresilence7@slrpnk.netOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoUnless it’s BECCS, the best they’re going to be is not adding CO2 to the atmosphere. That’s better than burning stuff, but not actually removing CO2
Not to any meaningful degree: the heating from CO2 emitted when your burn coal for energy is about 100000x more than the heat produced from the burning.
That’s why the big action which needs to happen is to stop burning fossil fuels.
I was thinking about heat pumps. 300% efficiency
They are electric and could be carbon negative depending on the source of electricity
Unless it’s BECCS, the best they’re going to be is not adding CO2 to the atmosphere. That’s better than burning stuff, but not actually removing CO2