Deebster to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoRule 84, etcimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1329arrow-down11
arrow-up1328arrow-down1imageRule 84, etcDeebster to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squarerevoopy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up29·1 year agoI argue that when presented with 9 normal looking numbers, the o is not an acceptable alternative to 0
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt just looks like a lowercase 0. Lowercase digits often look better anyway.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoLook up lowercase digits in your typography manual and be enlightened. And also start making nicer documents.
I argue that when presented with 9 normal looking numbers, the o is not an acceptable alternative to 0
deleted by creator
It just looks like a lowercase 0. Lowercase digits often look better anyway.
what
Look up lowercase digits in your typography manual and be enlightened. And also start making nicer documents.