• luckyhunter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not the money, it’s the cost of labor and materials driving up costs. I paid under 200k for my house just 6 years ago. You can’t even buy the raw materials to build a similar sized house for that.

          • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            The article is about affordable housing, not subsidized housing. If it costs 300K to build a house these days the builder is going to try to sell it for more than that.

            • psvrh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then government should be the builder.

              Not everything needs to removedd out to the private sector.

              • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because government run projects are well known for being cost effective and cheaper than private sector?

                • psvrh@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Actually, yes. They can be.

                  Much of the overrun that you hear of in, eg, the US and Canada is because of cost-plus contracts negotiated with the private sector. It’s been a very, very long since we’ve seen purely public offerings.

                  I’d also challenge someone who says “the private sector is more effective”. I get the impression they’ve never worked at private company larger than a neighbourhood coffee shop. I’ve worked a F50 companies; trust me, they can piss money away and blow through deadlines like it’s nobody’s business. Try to do an ERP conversion some day.

                  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Also to tack on, you only hear about the projects that blow their budget, because they are the problem projects. You don’t hear about the ≈75% of projects that come in “on time*” and under budget, because that’s the baseline of what is expected.

                    *For varying definitions of “on time.”

                  • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I don’t know what a ERP conversion is but it sounds yucky. I double my fee when contracting designs for the government, and engineers who can’t cut it end up taking government jobs. Unless the entire culture of government workers change, in my opinion, you have described a fever dream.