• iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    That can be extended to anything that isn’t practical or useful, what I’m saying isn’t that you should be paid for sitting on your couch specifically, what I’m saying is that you should have enough money to cover your needs even if your job is creating very abstract art, being a professional swimmer, or an artificial one like managing a manager.

    • PizzasDontWearCapes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who is responsible for providing for people who choose not to contribute?

      I’m not working away all day when I could be persuing a hobby and still getting paid just so someone else can persue a hobby and get paid

      • iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not talking about luxuries or even a comfortable life, I just think that everyone should have enough to live under a roof and have enough to eat healthy every day.

      • root@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would think being an elite athlete is way beyond just a hobby.

        Running a few laps around the field every day, yes a hobby. Being faster or able to run farther than 95% of the Australian population, that’s way beyond hobby levels.

        • PizzasDontWearCapes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          These are activities that only exist for the sake of the participants and are not financially self-sufficient

          They may be super intense hobbies, but if they aren’t jobs or charitable services, they are still hobbies