• future_synthetic@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can I argue that misrepresenting yourself in an argument intentionally is, in fact, done with ill intent an overwhelming majority of the time.

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article vacillates between saying sometimes identifying bad faith is good, actually, and trying to move the goal posts so everyone is still acting in good faith. Just about as good self-editing that I’d expect from LW.

    • gerikson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can, but it’s not really an argument, more of a statement. For example, do you have any anecdotal evidence of this being true?

      Maybe I’m just misunderstanding. You use the term “ill intent” which is subtly different from “bad faith”. It’s also a loaded term.

      • future_synthetic@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Using his own terminology here. He says in the piece that bad faith is often ‘incorrectly’ defined as ill intent, and my argument is that the ill intent is a package deal.