0x815@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agoAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1190arrow-down10cross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksfuturology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.helvetet.euaicopyright@lemm.eetech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1190arrow-down1external-linkAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.com0x815@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agomessage-square37fedilinkcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksfuturology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.helvetet.euaicopyright@lemm.eetech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareerwanlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoBut where do you draw the line between “a human did it using a tool” and “it wasn’t created by a human?” Generative art exists, and can be copyrighted. Also a drawing made with Photoshop involves a lot of complex filters (some might even use AI!) I agree on the “fuck copyright” part that said.
But where do you draw the line between “a human did it using a tool” and “it wasn’t created by a human?”
Generative art exists, and can be copyrighted. Also a drawing made with Photoshop involves a lot of complex filters (some might even use AI!)
I agree on the “fuck copyright” part that said.