The complementary lawsuits claim that the massacre in 2022 was made possible by tech giants, a local gun shop, and the gunman’s parents.

YouTube and Reddit are sued for allegedly enabling the racist mass shooting in Buffalo that left 10 dead::The complementary lawsuits claim that the massacre in 2022 was made possible by tech giants, a local gun shop, and the gunman’s parents.

  • adroit balloonEnglish
    238·
    1 year ago

    yeah, but progressives and liberals and all other “crazies and normal people” aren’t the ones committing mass shootings all the time.

    • danielton@lemmy.worldEnglish
      48·
      1 year ago

      Right, but since YouTube and Facebook are two of the most popular sites in the world, they aren’t really just magnets for alt-right crazies, since they appeal to almost everybody.

      • adroit balloonEnglish
        133·
        1 year ago

        right, but “everybody” aren’t the ones committing mass shootings all the time. that’s an alt-right crazies problem.

          • adroit balloonEnglish
            111·
            1 year ago

            Ok so isn’t the issue at hand whether the sites are to blame?

            let’s break this down so I can answer you in what I think is an honest way:

            1. Are the sites legally responsible for the content they host, generally speaking and/or in this context of radicalization and such subsequent results as these?

            and

            1. Do these sites bear any social/moral responsibility to moderate their more extreme content in good faith to try to prevent this sort of result?

            and

            1. Is there an overlap of 1 and 2?

            1 - this is for a court to decide. I’m not familiar enough with the very specifics of case law or with the suits being brought to know exactly what is being alleged, etc. I can’t opine on this other that to say that, from what I do know, it’s unlikely that a court would hold these sites legally responsible.

            2 - I fully believe that, yes, sites like these, massive, general-use public sites have a social and moral responsibility to keep their platforms safe. How and what that means is a matter for much debate, and I’m sure people here will do just that.

            3 - is there overlap? again, legally, I’m not sure, but there might be, and in the near future, there might be much more. also, should there be more? another subject for debate.

        • danielton@lemmy.worldEnglish
          49·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t say they were. Facebook and YouTube didn’t commit the shootings, and there isn’t anything particularly special about them that would disproportionately attract the alt-right crazies. They’re not hate sites.