• AnimusAstralis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    And here I thought that Fediverse was serious about being an alternative to heavily censored platforms. Now I see it’s just a joke.

    • adolf_hitler@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You thought that specific instance was serious about allowing piracy, which it’s not.

      Thankfully, due to the Fediverse, you can migrate to an instance that is. No other centralized service gives you that freedom.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The only thing it’s serious about is being a decentralized platform - if you want to access something, then choose an instance who’se admins are serious about being heavily censored.

      It’s the old adage of “if you don’t like something, do something about it”

      The fediverse gives you the tools and ability to surf the fediverse how you want, all through decentralization. Don’t like the rules on one instance? Move, simple as that.

      It’s the same context of “vote with your wallet” - only put your accounts and time into instances you want to put your account on and only donate to instances you want to donate to, vote with your time and money, that’s how we can make this platform better, for ourselves and for others.

    • paf0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not censorship, it’s just smart people protecting themselves from liability. Some things are clearly illegal and the admins should not be expected to take the heat for people who participate in those illegal activities.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some things are clearly illegal and the admins should not be expected to take the heat for people who participate in those illegal activities.

        But aren’t they protected under the same laws that other sites like Reddit are already protected under?

        As far as being responsible for what their users post, last I heard that already had laws that protected the sites that hosted them so they were not responsible.

        IANAL.

        • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Legal / illegal is the wrong term here because this type of thing is a civil matter.

          If you were a volunteer admin and receive a cease and desist notice from an expensive law firm with an army of lawyers representing a client with infinite money, what would you do?

          Would you pay your own lawyers out of your own pocket to stand up for your freedoms and rights, or would you just roll over and let someone else take up that fight? Would definitely be the latter for me.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Legal / illegal is the wrong term here because this type of thing is a civil matter.

            Has it been ever a civil matter for any other company that hosts? I have not heard of any lawsuits of any kind for decades at this point.

            As far as I know this is completely and absolutely settled, with no concern about future litigation possible.

            IANAL.

            • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              As far as I know this is completely and absolutely settled

              That may be true, but it’s easy to say that as a third party who is not receiving threats of litigation.

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That may be true, but it’s easy to say that as a third party who is not receiving threats of litigation.

                Well I’m not saying it out of ignorance as a third party, I’ve actually read articles going all the way back to the time of BBS sites, where US laws protect those who host these sites from being responsible for the comments that people make that sit on their servers.

                I don’t remember the exact law name right now (IANAL) but I know it exists, I’ve read articles about it before.

                • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That doesn’t really address my point though.

                  Even if you’re 100% confident that you will ultimately be found blameless, most people would take action to avoid facing a civil suit.

                  A well resourced opponent will drag you to consultation. Even forcing you to respond to a legal demand is an arduous task. You might grind through it and even get awarded costs, but you’d have to bear those costs while you’re going through the process.

                  Point is, they can still destroy your resolve without winning a case.

                  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Even forcing you to respond to a legal demand is an arduous task.

                    You’re over exaggerating the effort required to initially defend yourself against something like this.

                    Plus the safe harbor laws are very defined, so a judge would most likely throw the case out of court early on, if it even ever got that far. The safe harbor laws as I understand them are very clear on this.

        • Metz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lemmy.world is hosted on a german Server and afaik run by german people. Hosting or even just linking to anything piracy related in germany would be suicide.

            • Metz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              My bad. I was sure i read somewhere they are hosted in germany. guess i was wrong. Still, hosting or linking to illegal stuff inside the EU is probably still a very bad idea. apart from it violating the ToS of the hoster (Hetzner).

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. It’s not censorship, it’s a liability/legal issue.

      2. This isn’t “the fediverse”, it’s a single instance.

      3. You can move to a dedicated piracy instance or start your own.