Overwatch 2 is the worst game on Steam, according to user reviews | “The people who make Overwatch porn work harder than the people who make Overwatch”::undefined

    • Burnt@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      And 7 years after the fact, how is your one time $40 purchase still paying to keep the servers running?

      I don’t like the monetary scheme that Blizzard settled on for OW2, I’m never paying $25 for a skin, but the $10 battle pass every 2 months is reasonable in my opinion.

      If that battle pass contained all of that season’s cosmetic content and followed a FOMOless scheme more similar to Halo MCC or Deep Rock Galactic, I think most people wouldn’t complain but clearly we have whales that are willing to dump stupid amounts of cash on singular skins.

      • reversebananimals@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love how you’re pretending that the exact business model Blizzard operated on successfully for 15 years doesn’t work.

        • Burnt@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          What other Blizzard titles relied on a single time purchase and loot boxes for their payment scheme? Wasn’t WoW subscription based WITH paid expansions? StarCraft and Diablo definitely had paid expansions.

          Maybe the argument could be made for Hearthstone or HotS but I won’t consider them Blizzard’s flagship titles either.

      • shortgiraffe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        And 7 years after the fact, how is your one time $40 purchase still paying to keep the servers running?

        The company as a whole is profitable, and have been for at least the last few years. I’m on mobile so I’m not able to read their annual investor reports, but do they actually mention overwatch being a loss for the company on a premium model, or are you assuming that?

        • Burnt@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m making assumptions but I don’t think it’s asinine to assume that they would rather run their service with a constant steady income from a subscription model rather than a one time purchase over the period of half a decade. It would have been one thing if they released paid expansions to the base game every few years but they never did that.

          It also doesn’t matter if the company as a whole is profitable if Overwatch itself isn’t. They aren’t Kirkland with the food court hotdogs or rotisserie chickens, as in trying to use Overwatch to pull people into their other games even though it’s a net negative for them to continue to support.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What do you even accomplished by white Knight ingredients for a big media company with a long history of shitty business practices?

        • Burnt@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not picking up a pitchfork and joining the mob is now white knighting? Get the fuck outta here with that shit.

          I’m not here to defend Blizzard, frankly fuck them and their mismanagement of a great IP, but people are definitely blowing Overwatch’s failure out of proportion and just hopping on a bandwagon.