College professors are going back to paper exams and handwritten essays to fight students using ChatGPT::The growing number of students using the AI program ChatGPT as a shortcut in their coursework has led some college professors to reconsider their lesson plans for the upcoming fall semester.

  • Four_lights77@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    This thinking just feels like moving in the wrong direction. As an elementary teacher, I know that by next year all my assessments need to be practical or interview based. LLMs are here to stay and the quicker we learn to work with them the better off students will be.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And forget about having any sort of integrity or explaining to kids why it’s important for them to know how to do shit themselves instead of being wholly dependent on corporate proprietary software whose accessibility can and will be manipulated to serve the ruling class on a whim 🤦

      • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s insane talking to people that don’t do math.

        You ask them any mundane question and they just shrug, and if you press them they pull out their phone to check.

        It’s important that we do math so that we develop a sense of numeracy. By the same token it’s important that we write because it teaches us to organize our thoughts and communicate.

        These tools will destroy the quality of education for the students that need it the most if we don’t figure out how to reign in their use.

        If you want to plug your quarterly data into GPT to generate a projection report I couldn’t care less. But for your 8th grade paper on black holes, write it your damn self.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Putting quarterly data into ChatGPT is dangerous for companies because that information is being fed into the AI and accessible by its creators, which means you’re just giving away proprietary information and trade secrets by doing that. But do these chucklefucks give one single shit? No. Because they’re selfish, lazy assholes that want robots to do their thinking for them.

          • joel_feila@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well with more and more data abd services via the cloud, company don’t seem to care about data sharing

      • jarfil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        wholly dependent on corporate proprietary software

        FLOSS would want a word with you.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The way we have allowed corporations to take over the internet as a whole is deeply problematic for those reasons too, I agree with you. And it’s awful seeing what we’ve become.

    • SamC@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good luck doing one on one assessments in a uni course of 300+

    • JTode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      In what ways do you envision working with LLMs as an educator of children?

      I have used ChatGPT to explain to myself a number of fairly advanced technical and programming concepts; I work in Animation through my own self-study and some good luck, so I’m constantly trying to up my skills in the math that relates to it. When I come up against a math or C++ term or concept that I do not currently understand, I can generally get a pretty good conceptual understanding of it by working with ChatGPT.

      So at one point I wanted to understand what Linear Algebra specifically meant, and it didn’t stick but I do remember asking it to expand on things it said that weren’t clear, and it was able to competently do so. By asking many questions I was able - I think - to get clearer on a number of things which I doubt I ever would have learned, unless by luck I found someone who knows the math to teach me.

      It also flubbed a lot of basic arithmetic, and I had to mentally look for and correct that.

      This is useful to an autodidact like myself who has learned how to learn at a University level, to be sure.

      I cannot, however, think of a single beneficial way to use this to educate small children with no such years of mental discipline and ability to understand that their teacher is neither a genius nor a moron, but rather, a machine that pumps out florid expressions of data that resemble other expressions of similar data.

      Please, tell me one.

      • jarfil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Devise a physical problem that can be tested, have everyone in class pull a ChatGPT answer to it, have them read the answers out loud and vote on which one is right, then apply it to the physical version and see it fail. Show them how tweaking the answer just a bit solves the problem.

        years of mental discipline and ability to understand that their teacher is neither a genius nor a moron

        Ta-da! Just taught them that without all your years.

        I cannot, however, think of a single beneficial way to use this to educate small children

        Then you’re not a teacher. Please don’t ever teach small children.

        • JTode@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, I suppose the education system gets the teachers it pays for…

          • jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe. I like coming up with ways to explain things, but I don’t like children, so unless they pay me to host a YouTube channel… tough luck.

            • JTode@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And you think that teaching kids to use ChatGPT to figure out how to fix a broken fence gate, rather than, I dunno, teaching them Woodshop, is a good use of teachers’ time?

              • jarfil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Which one do you think they’re more likely to have 24/7 in their pocket: an AI assistant on a smartphone, or a chisel?

                Even today, the number of people with a multi-tool or a screwdriver, are much fewer than those with a smartphone. Show them a flint and striker, and they look at you like some doomsday prepper nutjob.