Larian has delayed the release of Baldur’s Gate 3, currently on pace to possibly be 2023’s Game of the Year, until they can figure out how to make split-screen work on Series S.

  • acastcandream@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

     I have a series S and even I think it’s unreasonable to expect full parity with a PS5/XSX after three or four years. It’s a $300 piece of hardware - it is remarkable what it does at its price point. It will be useful for a good 10 years, but it will not be able to keep up with new games after 5 at most in my opinion. It’ll be great for Indies or back catalogs.

    They need to stop trying to make it functionally a series X and focus more on making it a gamepass/xcloud machine. As it is, it’s just an albatross around their neck.

    Edit: Everything signaled that they were going to make it into a xcloud machine essentially. I’m not sure why they haven’t really pushed that harder.

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I feel like their planning for it was really shortsighted - like they were hoping to get a as many people to buy the console as possible so they could “win” the console war early by having more people adopt it by putting out a cheap console people who didn’t want to spend so much would be drawn to, and weren’t really thinking beyond the first few years of the generation. Maybe they figured once they had the lead, they cold get people up upgrade or something. By they didn’t get the early lead and now the cheaper console means devs can’t really fully develop for Xbox. This will only get worse as more games start getting developed.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Microsoft is terrible at Gaming. I fear how everyone seems to be ok with them buying companies up and putting games on GamePass. It’s not going to end well. It’s not even going well if you really take notice.

        • acastcandream@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s going great for me as the consumer with Game Pass. I have had over two years of essentially free games, because Microsoft rewards is too generous and easy to exploit. But I have no illusions about whether or not this consolidation is good for the industry. It simply isn’t. Yeah I guess y’all can call me out or whatever for using it anyway, but the series S with nearly free GamePass has just been too good for me as a dad with a full-time job and children. I’m still against the merger lol

          I vote with my dollar where I can, but sorry, sometimes I make compromises just like anybody else. That being said, if I have to start actually paying for it, even at the current price, I’m out. So basically it depends on when they decide they don’t want rewards to stay around.

          • belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            Its going great now. The monopoly they want is to increase charges on you and you have to pay forever to keep access. This is specifically the point of gamepass.

            It may workout for you in the short rub, but you are still losing choice and value (you only rent access) in the process.

            • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              As many people already boycott sony consoles due to them paying extra to game studios to never release certain games on xbox, there’s literally no alternative currently.

              And Game Pass is great, if they pump the price too much, it will just seize to be relevant and life goes on. AAA games are pretty dirt cheap considering prices have increased way slower than inflation and average game complexity.

              • BadlyDrawnRhino @aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                But Microsoft is doing exactly the same thing, only instead of paying for exclusivity of one title, they’re buying developers so not just their next title, but all future releases will be exclusive, up until MS decides they’re not worth it and dumps them.

                Sony absolutely participates in anti-consumer practices, but let’s not pretend that MS is any better.

                • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Day one releases on PC and Xbox, and coming later on PS5 is quite a bit different to day one on PS5, year later on PC and never on Xbox.

                  There’s bad, and then there’s “you’ll never play this unless you buy our console”

              • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                What games have Sony bought exclusively too? I’ve seen them pay for development of several. Microsoft has taken away sequels from PlayStation in the past. That’s worse imo.

            • acastcandream@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Some people can be pretty dogmatic about this stuff but yeah, I feel like it’s better than cash. Especially because the stuff I do for rewards gives them pretty useless data and I have all kinds of privacy stuff running in the background protecting my data

    • SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the problem they’ve given themselves is that they pushed it as a cheaper alternative to the X whilst also maintaining that it’ll be able to play the same games.

      How do they go about messaging that can’t be the case going forward without pissing off those that spent the money on the S in the first place.

        • SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Only takes one though. As soon as someone looking at buying a console sees there’s a chance they’ll miss out, they’ll potentially make the decision to go with the Sony machine instead.

          Microsoft already has an exclusive issue, this isn’t doing anything but compounding that issue.

      • acastcandream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As I said in another comment, I own a series S, and I think it’s pretty ridiculous of me to expect a $300 piece of hardware to be able to play the latest games past five years. Even with what they have said, I just kind of assumed it can’t be true. 

        I imagine in two or three years I will switch to dev mode and boot retro arch on it. 

        • SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right but you’re probably a little more clued up to this sort of stuff than the average consumer who’s seen the marketing and thought ‘oh lovely, I don’t need a disk drive’ in this thing.

          Both my brothers own the S. It’s an incredible little machine, but imo they screwed the proverbial pooch when they pushed this as a 1080p alternative to the more powerful Series X.