It’s gonna be great watching centrist Democrats find an excuse to blame progressives when the person who represents centrists perfectly hands the Senate to Mitch McConnell.
The country is going to hand McConnell the Senate. The 2024 map is so bad that Biden could win by 9 points nationally and still end up with a GOP Senate.
Assuming Manchin doesn’t do so first by switching parties.
It depends on who he is caucusing with in 2024.
Republicans may not give Manchin the seniority that Democrats give him if he switches caucuses.
It depends on who he is caucusing with in 2024.
Depends on the issue, I suppose. If it’s progressive policy, he’ll continue to caucus with Republicans. And centrists will continue to support him, it seems.
That isn’t what caucusing is.
What I’m talking about is who decides the majority leader and the majority party. Right now, even though Manchin doesn’t always vote for Democrat bills, he does vote to make Democrats the majority party in the Senate.
This isn’t something you flip easily.
Right now, even though Manchin doesn’t always vote for Democrat bills, he does vote to make Democrats the majority party in the Senate.
We’ll see if he continues to do so.
I don’t want to hear any whining from centrists if he does change parties. Progressives told you who he was.
That’s just a 50-50 with VP Harris breaking ties again (it’s really 48+1+1 vs 50 because of Sanders and Sinema, but that’s only a little important).
Do it already, Jesus. This dip shit just wants attention.
Kick him out before he leaves.
This is part of the reason I bicker with Liberals about appealing to electoralism all the damn time. Great, we technically got a “D” win, but the party installed a senator that doesn’t vote with the party and pulls the senate more “center” as they try to scoop up disaffected conservatives. So, they effectively installed their own opposition. Well done.
Very much the smartest people in the room.
Note: venting, and I’m not talking about individuals just the collective “wisdom” of belt-way liberals.
.
These are good points, and maybe I was less articulate because I was responding to the article grumpily. A more accurate statement would be “I’m sick of pundits and beltway liberals telling me what policy positions aren’t ‘possible’ while being wildly popular amongst the electorate on both sides of the political spectrum. Instead of running on that they opt to play percentage points, message on issues that don’t upset their donors, and drift the party’s platform increasingly in the interest of the corpos over decades as they back candidates closer to the center instead.”
Now, Manchin might not be the best candidate to voice this opinion on: because electorally, you’re right, the partisan bias was too great in that state. But, man, I heard the quote from an Obama staffer during the Georgia run-off: “Stacy Abrams is teaching us the power of directly campaigning on improving material conditions.” I was gob smacked that they spoke about this as though it was a revelation. If you want the exact quote I can dig through my podcasts and find it.
However, I might push back slightly on him appearing in a legislation event as some virtuous gesture. He himself was instrumental in including little exceptions in previous bills for auctioning off land for drilling, explorations for new drill sites, and continues to push that our reliance on oil as a place borne of pragmatism and not at all influenced by his donations.
.
Ah, you’re right! I misread you!
He’s just about the only “Democrat” who could be elected in a blood red coal mining state.
Plenty of Democrats get elected in majority red states- like Andy Beshear
I live in WV.
We ain’t electing a D. Manchin was as good as it’s gonna get here, and by all accounts he’s pretty shit. It’s a running joke that people call him Maserati Manchin cause he’s only ever here in his Maserati, electing to live in DC on his houseboat.
.
And I’m really hoping we get to hang onto him.
OMG having this argument with people is maddening. Their refusal to think logically makes me want to bash my head on a wall
Right? That top-level comment is completely unhinged.
No the top level comment is the logical take
For my own understanding, I want to have it explained to me how it was unhinged!
Granted, voicing the take as I did pertaining to Manchin likely isn’t the smartest due to his electorate demographics, but I can recall a few cases where Democrat party officials threw their weight behind more center primary candidates as an appeal towards the center.
Edit: I suppose my umbrige is with how those candidates coincidentally happen to favor neo-liberal tendencies and don’t advocate for working class or on environmental issues. Cause, man, what a dream it would be to have an actual left party as opposed to a center and right.
party installed a senator that doesn’t vote with the party
People complain about “two-partyism” and tribalism- then complain about senators voting with their beliefs or their constituents rather than the party.
The problem with Manchin is that a lot of the policies he has blocked are actually fairly popular with his constituents. His “beliefs” are purely about money in his pocket.
Source:your ass
I mean you’re not wrong
deleted by creator
On Lemmy people deriding liberals are very often farther left, not conservatives.
Centrists don’t care. They punch left while screaming that they’re punching right.
Lemmy did an odd thing. I replied to someone replying to the top comment (“bickering with liberals”), who had assumed that poster was a Trumper. The person I replied to even replied to my comment, then they deleted both and my reply somehow ended up attached to your comment instead.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Dude, you’re the uninformed one here not knowing about basic political science terms. Again, the US idea of “liberal” is not what the rest of the world calls “liberal”.
deleted by creator
Yeah but is the “douchebag” comment really neccessary when you were corrected on something? This ain’t Reddit. Chill.
deleted by creator
“Liberal” in this context is from a socialist/communist lens. It’s not what the US calls “liberal”. It’s just another name for a capitalist, as in what Adam Smith defined. “Economic” liberalism.
deleted by creator
these people just don’t get harassed enough in real life by the regular citizens whose lives they destroy… i mean this asshole can just freely go about his daily life while he actively ruins people’s lives, it’s criminal…
nobody stops him and asks him: hey Joe, why the hell are you selling me out?
The people there love him. WV is a clear case of voters voting against their best interest.
Because obviously everyone who doesn’t just unfailingly agree with your personal views only disagrees because they’re stupid.
Because WV is crumbling to pieces and being held back by their lust for the glory days of coal, when everyone got rich easily. I have two sites there I support and travel there frequently, I see the devistation going on there. Yet the voters keep voting for Republicans who are preventing them from moving forward. Obama tried to create solar panel jobs there, well the entire solar system ecosystem there, the local Republicans convinced the voters to say no to it. Theses were fantastic high paying jobs. I see the people sleeping on the streets, we have a homeless camp just outside of our office in Huntington. So maybe, just maybe, I might have an inkling of an idea of what I’m talking about.
Do you?
There’s homeless people in every state. Doesn’t mean that the state is crumbling just because it doesn’t bankroll the bums
Reading comprehension? I have offered way more info than, there’s homeless people. I have 9 years of regular experience there. I have friends that live there. I have offered facts of the political environment there. And you’re counter is there homeless people everywhere.
The only other thing you brought up was the solar industry. Everything else was just flowery language with no actual facts.
If the only other thing they brought up was the solar industry, what “everything else” are you talking about? There were two things in what they said, seems like two things have been discussed and now there’s “everything else” out there somewhere.
deleted by creator
The dems should never have expected to rely on his seat anyway. Hes from the most bumfuck state in the union. West Virginias entire economy basically runs on coal
They didn’t. Every judge Manchin votes through and every Democratic policy he reluctantly says “Aye” for is playing with house money. Everyone knows how impossibly difficult the Senate map is for Democrats in 2024 and has for the better part of a decade.
This guy is just another example of republicans willing to lie and cheat to gain power. We get it. You lied about being a democrat. It’s not a secret, just make it official already. Garbage humans, the lot of them.
I think his plan is clear:
-
threaten the Democrats that he will bolt before the election if the party tries to primary him
-
if he doesn’t switch parties before the election, and gets reelected, he will switch to Independent if the Republicans win back the majority and try to get a plum committee assignment out of Mitch
The state party isn’t gonna support a primary against him. It’ll just be Paula Jean Swearengin running a doomed campaign like in 18 (the last time she primaried him) and 20 (when she ran against our other nepo baby senator)# .
You’re forgetting the possibility that he slithers off of his yacht and dissolves back into the murky black depths from whence he came. Or maybe he trips and falls overboard. Either one. Does pure evil respond to the forces of gravity?
-
deleted by creator
Kabuki theatre. This is about getting reelected
For 99% of elected officials, every action they take is about getting re-elected. The difference here is Manchin has a counterproductive strategy to do so.
He’s in West Virginia, attending a green energy event is very much against his constituents’ interest
He was never really part of it anyway. I’d rather see a strong progressive run in WV. You might be surprised with someone who stands for the people and not just for themselves.
Removed by mod
This is the best summary I could come up with:
But Biden’s actions on climate are one issue now pushing the fossil fuels-aligned senator towards the exit door and he will reportedly skip the anniversary event.
The senator recently dined with a top Biden aide, NBC said, as the White House tried “to ensure the president is not caught off-guard when Manchin publicly breaks with him”.
Hailing “one of the most historic pieces of legislation passed in decades”, he said West Virginia, a state dominated by coal interests, was “already seeing real results”.
But he also said he would “continue to fight the Biden administration’s unrelenting efforts to manipulate the law to push their radical climate agenda at the expense of both our energy and fiscal security”.
On Thursday, Manchin told West Virginia radio he was “thinking seriously” about ceasing to identify as a Democrat, whether to run for re-election as an independent or as a third-party candidate for president, backed by the No Labels group.
Democrats hold the Senate 51-49, a majority that already includes three independents: Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Angus King of Maine and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.
I’m a bot and I’m open source!
I can’t with this guy. Is he some sort of attention removed or what?
He’s no longer the “50th vote” in the Senate so he hasn’t gotten nearly the same media attention. It’s eating him up and I just love it.
Fuck this guy. How about they support an actual Democrat to run against him if he pulls this shit?
I think Manchin wants out.
