• EmptySlime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah that can get very boring. I suppose though if they had any interest in how things actually worked they wouldn’t be libertarians. That’s exactly what kept me from aligning with them back in high school when I first started getting into politics.

    Like I got as far as roads and it was like “Wait a second, how would you handle roads going into areas where where it wouldn’t be profitable to run them?” They either just wouldn’t have roads, or someone would build it and would make it profitable by charging exorbitant tolls. Neither of those were acceptable to me and my agreement with libertarianism died. There are always going to be things in society that are not profitable but are worth having because they have downstream benefits to society.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The problem I’ve had with a lot of them related to what you mentioned is that their very base motivation for wanting libertarianism is selfishness. They don’t want to pay for things other people use so the argument becomes “well that area just doesn’t have roads. I won’t live there so I don’t care. That’s for the locals in that area to figure out.”

      From what I’ve gathered libertarianism is “I got mine, fuck you.”

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like hospitals. Sure they can be profitable, but they should still be running with funding even if they are not.

    • bAZtARd@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea, like, you know, clean water, moderate temperatures and a livable environment…