• Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    it comes across as bigoted lies because nearly every time, even the most reasonable sounding arguments contain blatant misinformation at best and lies at worst

    framing gender queer as porn because it includes one sex scene is just slightly less ridiculous than framing stephen king’s ‘it’ as porn

    its hard to take your comment as sincere when the most genuine and reasonable speech folks can muster still relies on distorting the truth

    its also hard to take concerned citizens as genuinely concerned when their concern only ever seems to kick in when it lets them yell about the alphabet people

    • OceanSoap
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay, so what about the hooks and my post is misinformation or lies? Seeing examples of the exact problematic pages shows you its true and the information is correct.

      I didn’t say gender queer as a whole is porn, but there are sections in it that are pornographic in nature. To be clear: These scenes would still be an issue if it were a book about straight people.

      It makes no sense not to just replace it with queer books and stories that don’t contain this sexually explicit stuff.