Is this really true?

What do you guys on Lemmy say? Most of us are tech people so we are more used to being alone with our thoughts perhaps.

  • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a distinct line between social/sense deprivation torture and simple inner reflection or meditation. Just saying. It’s maybe for every individual different, but there definitely is.

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not necessarily just being alone, it’s being alone with zero mental stimulation. There are lots of people happy be to alone with a computer or TV or books. Nobody can be alone without anything for more than a few days.

    It’s kind of like saying “is it really true people have to sleep everyday?”

    • 1984@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      True, the article does specifically say people spent time doing nothing, and just thinking.

      But this shocks me:

      The researchers then decided to take the experiment a step further. For 15 minutes, the team left participants alone in a lab room in which they could push a button and shock themselves if they wanted to. The results were startling: Even though all participants had previously stated that they would pay money to avoid being shocked with electricity, 67% of men and 25% of women chose to inflict it on themselves rather than just sit there quietly and think, the team reports online today in Science.

      Really a wtf moment for me. I take from this that most people think it’s painful to meditate as well, because that’s reflecting on your thoughts.

      • ramble81@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I may be looking at it wrong but there’s an odd flaw to me in the premise. I view “pay money to avoid being shocked” as something that is happening to you, out of your control. Pressing the button, regardless of the outcome, is something you are choosing to do and is most likely a result of curiosity and bordem.

        I think a better approach would have been “if you push this button, the simulation is over and you loose”, and then see what people do.

        • ScrimbloBimblo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also, I think most people are curious. It’s not often you get a chance to electrically shock yourself in a safe environment where you know you won’t be injured.

        • Lith@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This headline makes a ton of assumptions, namely that the ability to feel boredom means that you hate being alone with your thoughts. Of course people who are stuck in a boring ass experimentation room with no stimuli are willing to try out a minor shock. I wouldn’t be surprised if most people would even consider it a fun experience. I know I’ve thought about playing with tasers before.

          Something like “think about your past and explain how you feel, or press this button when you want to end the experiment early at the cost of a shock” would at least be a relevant premise. This is just another benign experiment turned into doomer clickbait, and I wouldn’t let it paint my worldview.