• Barry Zuckerkorn@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s already the case with most corporate managed BYO device policies. The typical scenario is that an employer gives you the choice:

    1. Use the company-owned and company-managed device. No root/admin access, no privileges to install unauthorized software, sometimes policies against personal accounts or files or use.
    2. Bring your own device, but consent to the company’s IT department managing your security and potentially monitoring your use. If you’re going to connect this device to the company’s LAN (through wifi or VPN or otherwise), you’re going to let us lock it down.

    It’s a legitimate concern that these types of things would normalize corporate-managed devices in our personal lives as consumers, and worth resisting in that space, but I don’t think it would actually change the status quo in the corporate world to go from proprietary device management lockdowns to some kind of public standard for lockdowns.

    • randomwords@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is exactly why I will never do 2. Provide a device if you want control. I will not give you the ability to wipe my personal phone remotely just to check my work email on it.

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. If you’re going to lock down and control a device I’m going to need that device provided to me.