Environmental campaigners have called on the government to learn from its own successes after official figures showed the use of single-use supermarket plastic bags had fallen 98% since retailers in England began charging for them in 2015.

Annual distribution of plastic carrier bags by seven leading grocery chains plummeted from 7.6bn in 2014 to 133m last year, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said on Monday.

  • treefingers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine if the public transport system wasn’t rubbish and your girlfriend could travel in the same 30 minutes?

    Public transport isn’t the problem, it’s the solution

    • pfannkuchen_gesicht@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Really depends where you are how feasible it is. Where I live we have a great public transport system. Most stations can be reached within 10 minutes when walking and there’s a tram leaving the station every 10 minutes. So getting anywhere in the city is fairly quick and wait times are mininal in most cases.
      Travel outside the city and it’s a whole different story and unfortunately there isn’t really a good way to fix it. Just increasing the frequency of busses/trains isn’t feasible because 90% of the rides will be empty at this point which makes no sense.

    • Polar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay. I’ll tell my city to just tear down half of it so they can build a better system.

      Like I said, not all towns and cities were designed for it. It’s not something you can just plop in centuries down the road. The world doesn’t work that way.

      Any new development should have public transit in mind. Old development can’t really be retrofitted. It’s like you missed my entire comment.

      • median_user@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Car-centric cities waste tonnes of space on parking which sits empty most or all of the time. Improving them requires less knocking stuff down and more filling in the gaps.

        Luckily your city doesn’t have to pay for this - since property developers will do it for you to make money for themselves. You just need to fix the regulatory barriers: remove parking minimums and legalise mixed-use zoning.

        If you want to accelerate the process, your local government can adopt the Japanese model: build rail or light rail and then develop dense areas around or above it. This is generally profitable but requires taking on a decent amount of initial risk.

        So it can be done. But sitting around grumbling about how a better future is impossible because everything has to stay how it is right now won’t get us there.

        • Polar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So it can be done. But sitting around grumbling about how a better future is impossible because everything has to stay how it is right now won’t get us there.

          Conveniently ignoring the part where I said new developments should absolutely have public transit in mind.

      • Vii@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In many places the cities were retrofitted for car centric infrastructure already, why couldnt it happen again?