It scratches the surface of the most obvious stuff. I’d only add running apps in isolation (docker or adduser) and maybe fail2ban.

  • Krtek@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    While in no means a security measure, just disabling IPv4 for SSH on my VPS has completely eliminated bots/scripts attempting to login to my VPS directly

  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s my advice:

    Disable password authentication and allow only key/certificate/token/etc wherever feasible. Don’t even ask for a password if some other authentication mechanism can be used instead. Human-memorized passwords are weak and generated passwords are a poor substitute for proper cryptographic key exchange.

    su, sudo, and Polkit are privilege escalations waiting to happen. Remove them if possible; deprivilege them (remove the setuid bit) if not. Do not allow any means for an unprivileged user to get a root shell, regardless of authentication, because unprivileged accounts may be backdoored and letting them elevate will grant root privileges to the attacker as well.

    On your local machine, always log in as root on a separate virtual console using a separate password. On remote machines, always log in as root using an ssh key only accessible to the root account on your local machine.

    I’m iffy about hiding SSH behind a VPN. Doing this creates a serious risk of being locked out of your own server, and if your SSH server is configured correctly (as described above), then the security benefits aren’t that big. If you do find the risks acceptable, feel free to do this, but you shouldn’t feel obligated.

    Docker is unnecessary complexity and overhead. Use systemd to isolate things; it can do things like filtering system calls and hiding portions of the file system. SELinux might be good too, if you can figure out how to use it (I never could).

    Fail2ban is unnecessary if nothing accepts passwords for authentication. There are no fails to ban.

        • Bipta@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s mostly good advice. Certainly not comprehensive but this is securing servers we’re talking about.

        • Technoguyfication
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, because pretty much all of it is bad. Elaborating would be meaningless.

          • NateSwift@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Explaining why something is bad advice is as important as saying it is. Otherwise it’s just a pissing match between two random people on the internet. Why also keeps people from making similar problems.

          • F5XS@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I also want to know, being a beginner sysadmin myself. If you think that his advice is bad and you’re not elaborating, I’ll be taking his advice because his sounds sane so far.

    • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is definitely good advice - and an interesting point on removing ‘‘sudo’’

      I would add a clarification: moving SSH to cert only prevents password guessing, but also - if possible - only allow specific IPs to access it. This could be down to the country level if roaming a lot. Also use >1 IP so that you don’t lock yourself out!