L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThe World’s Largest Wind Turbine Has Been Switched Onwww.iflscience.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1262arrow-down12file-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansworldnewsenvironment@beehaw.orghackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1260arrow-down1external-linkThe World’s Largest Wind Turbine Has Been Switched Onwww.iflscience.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansworldnewsenvironment@beehaw.orghackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareanteaters@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoHow should I know? Maybe it contains downtime for maintenance or sth? Point is these numbers are based on yearly average so why write about 5 years?
minus-square Morphit @feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year ago How should I know? Exactly. Why add a time unit if it doesn’t communicate anything? It produces a year’s worth of energy per year, by definition. They could just quote the average power and be done but they tacked on “per year” for no reason.
How should I know? Maybe it contains downtime for maintenance or sth? Point is these numbers are based on yearly average so why write about 5 years?
Exactly. Why add a time unit if it doesn’t communicate anything? It produces a year’s worth of energy per year, by definition. They could just quote the average power and be done but they tacked on “per year” for no reason.