I had someone steel this and change “butts” to “Christian” and weirdly enough, lengthen my skirt. Kept the flame boots, but no short skirts.

  • Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The point still stands, in the minutiae you’re addressing. People post absolute garbage opinions on a regular basis, and are free to do so, as long as their platform allows it. This doesn’t go into the consequences of pissing off a lot of people, but you’re still free to do it.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The point does not stand. I don’t think any set of rules that sees “N***** N***** N*****” as acceptable speech should be respected, nor any person who thinks that way.

      • Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree with the spirit, but I disagree with what the point of the comic is - it’s not trying to make a point about respect per se, just about freedom of speech. Even if you wouldn’t be a part of a community that allows hate speech, if you encounter it “in the street” so to speak - there’s just nothing you can do.

          • CaptainEffort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I disagree. Something being allowed doesn’t mean it’s acceptable.

            I mean there are loads of bigoted comments all over Twitter and Facebook, and I wouldn’t call any of those “acceptable” despite technically being allowed.

              • CaptainEffort@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lmao what? Saying that people should be allowed to speak their minds isn’t the same as agreeing with everything everyone has to say.

                Honestly, you assuming that it’s an “endorsement” speaks much more to your own issues than anything else. Maybe learn that life isn’t so binary - that things can be a little more nuanced.

                • irmoz@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think you might have things backwards. The way I see it, I’m the one trying to add shades of grey to a world you are describing as black and white. Either they agree, or they don’t, that’s why you say. I say no, it’s more complicated than that. And yet, you say this is somehow reducing to a binary. Maybe I’m taking crazy pills. You tell me.

                  • CaptainEffort@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Either they agree or they don’t

                    That’s not at all what I’m saying. I’m actually saying the opposite. Whether anyone agrees with anyone else is entirely irrelevant to my point.

                    I’m saying that people are allowed to say whatever they want, and that them being allowed to do so doesn’t mean that what they’re saying is actually acceptable.

                    For example, someone can go on Twitter and have a full blown racist rant. They’re allowed to do that. But that doesn’t mean that what they did is acceptable.

                    You’re saying that if something is allowed, it must be acceptable. That it being allowed in the first place somehow implies an endorsement of the behavior. That’s pretty much the definition of black and white thinking.