• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I think it’s great. We should fucking try it.

    Seriously, though, I think it would be nice but it’s going to be impossible unless you can fully get rid of greedy, corrupt, power hungry pieces of shit with zero empathy.

    • kubok@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Don’t forget the morons who keep worshipping said pieces of shit. Even now, I run into Musk cultists regularly.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      So as long as the the greedy, power-hungry pieces of shit have at least some empathy, we can make it work?

        • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I guess what I’m saying is that an individual with lack of empathy is much less of a problem for an egalitarian society than one that seeks power. And yes, even empathic individuals seek power.

          The problem is one of human nature. We need a society that works for humans, and that means a system that puts limits on the worst parts of human nature. Saying “this will work when people behave better” means it’s never going to work.

          And to be clear: I think this is one of the big advantages that anarchism has over, say, socialism. With no power apparatus to corrupt, there’s less of a target for the corrupt power-seekers.

          But it needs to be structured in a way that reinforces eusocial behavior and disincentivizes antisocial behavior; further, the mechanisms for those reinforcements and disincentives needs to be communal rather than centralized, or someone will steal the reinforcement apparatus for their own selfish ends.