floofloof@lemmy.ca to U.S. News@beehaw.orgEnglish · 10 hours agoCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up161arrow-down10cross-posted to: medicine@mander.xyzscience@lemmy.worldtransgendernews@hexbear.nethackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up161arrow-down1external-linkCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to U.S. News@beehaw.orgEnglish · 10 hours agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: medicine@mander.xyzscience@lemmy.worldtransgendernews@hexbear.nethackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squarenotabot@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 hours agoWould the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?
minus-squareMidnitte@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoThe for-profit journals that are asking for more money, your asking what might motivate them?
minus-squarenotabot@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 minutes agoThey already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don’t know, but I’d assumed not.
Would the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?
The for-profit journals that are asking for more money, your asking what might motivate them?
They already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don’t know, but I’d assumed not.