• hydration9806
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Wow people really didn’t like my question!

    To respond to yours though, I’d say it depends on how much content there is! If a game can easily take 1000 hours with no degradation of enjoyment, I would pay $100 for it

    Edit to add: I realize this didnt exactly address your question, but I’m not sure what percentage since it heavily depends on the quality and quantity of content

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      34 minutes ago

      Loved all gtas. Never played any for anywhere close to 1000 hours. Probably closer to 100. So that’s like… 10$? Seems fair to me, no?

      Funny enough, all the games in which I have more than 1000 hours are all f2p.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For me personally, I find it really easy to add “hours” to a game’s runtime, and I’d sooner pay more for a higher quality experience and a shorter runtime. I’ve spent about a fifth of that 1000 mark in both Baldur’s Gate 3 and Elden Ring, and they’d have been worth $100 to me. Indiana Jones was worth every bit of the $70 I paid, and it took me under 20 hours.