• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “A senior administration official told NBC News that they expect 5%-10% of the federal workforce to quit, which, they estimate, could lead to around $100 billion in savings.”

    If they quit now, and are paid for another 8 months, how does that save any money?

    Similarly, if they quit and need to be replaced, you’re going to spend more money hiring and training the replacement, so for 8 months you’re paying double salary, one for the person who quit and one for their replacement…

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh they’ll be replaced, with “private” workers supplied by Musk, etc.

        The private “workers” will be AI or cheaply paid foreign workers.

        They will be incapable of doing the job, not because they are incompetent, but because they were the lowest bid and lied.

        After 2+ years of doing nothing they’ll need to be replaced by more workers. The government can’t function without them, so we’ll hire twice as many, still paying less than the average American and pocketing the remainder.

        After 4+ years, assuming the administration leaves, they’ll all be fired by the new administration and Americans will be brought in. They’ll have to do 4+ years worth of backlog plus the current job. After these 4 years they be deemed as incompetent and we’ll start the whole cycle over again.

        • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I honestly see this as more tree-shaking. It gives “disloyal” folks a way select themselves out, and provides a lot of empty seats to fill with “their” people.

          Combined with the Section F stuff, I think this will also have a net negative impact to the economy of the greater DC-metro area. Yanno, those people that voted against Trump in the election. It’s hard to not see all this as punitive.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is what it looks like when some of the richest minds that russia can buy brainstorm ways to damage the US.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unless someone is literally about to start a new job in two weeks anyway, why the hell would they take such a pitiful buyout? $25k is jack shit these days especially when the cost is your entire livelyhood.

        • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          It is when your replacement is someone with undying loyalty to a fascist dictator. It’s not about efficiency, it’s about loyalty and ideology. The more people leave, the more powerful Trump Musk Trusk becomes.

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also it prevents them from joining another government position for 5 years or they have to repay it before they start the job

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      and the funds probably have to be allocated by congress… as it is they and NOT a diaper-wearing buffoon in lifted shoes, that controls the ‘purse’.

      even the maga nuts in congress should be pissed as hell at lord diaper’s unconstitutional power and money grab.

      • dnick@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Might have to look at that though, it’s possible once the funds have been allocated to a department Congress extra less control over how there are used. As long as there’s some loophole where the money can be spent on severance, and it doesn’t cost more money than was allocated for the year(how can it? It’s just paying people for not working)

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Paying people not to work? Sounds like the Department Of Government Efficiency at work

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not a buyout. They can continue to WFH until September if they swear to resign. That’s not a buyout, that’s just continuing to work until you resign in the future. It also doesn’t guarantee them their jobs, just that they won’t be fired for not returning to the office (which is something the administration will probably going to have a hard time doing).

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Uh. Without regard to department?

    I mean, okay, if more people resign in department A than B, to some degree you can transfer people, but it’s not like there’s some generic “federal employee” skillset.

    EDIT: I guess if too many people did leave in one area, that you could re-hire there, and eight months severance isn’t actually that large. I guess if someone were that on-the-edge about their job, it might not be that big a deal anyway.

    Maybe it’s a standard practice in business layoffs. Not familiar with practice there. You’d rather have people on the edge of leaving leave then people that want to stay.

    I’m also kind of wondering if there are any jobs that hire full-time for limited periods of time, like maybe a Census poll worker. Like, if the government only planned to hire someone for three months and he just extended an offer for eight months severance if they walk out the door, that may wind up being a little awkward.

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    FTS. They got the best benefits. We need them to stay and just lay low. For all our sakes.

    • StayDoomed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      With the bills proposed by the house right now federal workers won’t have great benefits for long. Benefits are better on the county level in many cases already.