• jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Well, that’s the intent at least. Not to form an opinion.

    • emmy67@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If you’re of the idea that it’s not a genocide you’re wrong. There is no alternate explanation. If it were giving a fact that would be correct. The fact that it’s giving both sides is an opinion rather than a fact.

      If their ibtebtion was fact only. The answer would have been yes

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        You’re arguing with an AI. It’s a computer. It doesn’t have an opinion. It gives perspective on both sides and you determine an answer. Just because you have more conviction it doesn’t make the AI formulate an opinion.