• ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Except she didn’t promise any of that (not her in particular) & the 2-state solution is a farce where the Genocide will still continue & Israel will be given more priority & as for reproductive rights Never though killing unborn children was a reproductive right

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      as for reproductive rights Never though killing unborn children was a reproductive right

      Giving a woman the right to choose to abort her fetus or not is definitely a reproductive right and also a basic human right.

      It’s healthcare and it is not for politicians to decide when it should be between a woman and her doctor.

    • Glasgow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Huh? Many of those were her original campaign promises.

      Genocide will be ramped up and concerns ignored instead of just continuing while facing increasing public scrutiny and backlash. He literally told you this. Biden was a zionist at heart but Kamala would’ve softened after winning. And even if she didn’t. Argument isn’t whether she was good for Gaza, it’s that she was objectively, better than Trump.

      Trump says Israel needs to ‘finish what they started’ and said war with Hamas is ‘taking a long time’

      Trump told Netanyahu he wants Gaza war over by time he enters office

      vs

      Kamala Harris says ‘I will not be silent’ on suffering in Gaza after Netanyahu talks

      The current GOP is busy writing “finish them” on Israeli artillery shells. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/nikki-haley-writes-finish-them-israeli-artillery-shell-drawing-criticism-2024-05-29/

      There is no argument for letting Trump/GOP get in if you care about Gaza. Of course they’re worse.

      Miriam Adelson sought support from candidate Trump for Israel’s annexation of the West Bank, pledging more than $100 million to Trump’s campaign in exchange for U.S. recognition of Israel’s sovereignty over the region.

      It has ensured Palestine’s erasure. We’re now in the ‘Greater Israel’ period in U.S politics

      Friedman, however, suggests that we should not look to Trump but to those around him — to figures like former ambassador David Friedman, Jason Greenblatt, and others who pledge to continue the unfinished work of Trump’s first term. These are the people who will be at the center of what Friedman calls a “Greater Israel” period in U.S. policy: supporting Israeli annexation and ethnic cleansing in the West Bank, Gaza, and parts of Lebanon; lifting sanctions on settlers; and preventing any bans on weapons transfers. “They have lists of things that they are ready to do,” Friedman says, warning that we should take them at their word.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I like how you talk more about Israel/Palestine than you do about the United States.

      Priorities looking real good.