Slightly too broad of a definition. Nepal, Colombia, and Venezuela can only be as “Socialist” as Denmark, Sweden or other Euro Soc-Dem models, there is no public ownership of the means of production. What makes them unique is that they happen to be in the global south and on the receiving end of imperialism, and therefore more incentivized to align with AES than with the empire.
Slightly too broad of a definition. Nepal, Colombia, and Venezuela can only be as “Socialist” as Denmark, Sweden or other Euro Soc-Dem models, there is no public ownership of the means of production. What makes them unique is that they happen to be in the global south and on the receiving end of imperialism, and therefore more incentivized to align with AES than with the empire.