The sentencing procedure for our first criminally convicted felon President is due to begin at 9:30 AM Eastern/6:30 AM Pacific.

Let’s keep all the comments and posts wrangled here.

Live coverage should be… Oh, I’m just going to say “everywhere”. CNN, MSNBC, etc. etc. This is history so everyone should have it.

Edit As expected, Trump is appearing remotely.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-hush-money-sentencing-01-10-25/index.html

Prosecution is asking for more time to read the probation report, apparently they haven’t read it yet.

Prosecution wants “Unconditional Discharge” then layed out every reason why it shouldn’t be unconditional. Trump showed no remorse, believes he’s above the law, that the court has no authority over him.

Defense is now making their presentation.

Trump is now speaking, underlining everything the Prosecution stated. Unrepentant, defiant, disrespectful.

Judge Merchan is addressing the court and CNN cuts away to cover California. LOL.

No live broadcasting the sentencing, but audio will be available after.

7:09 AM - Sentenced to Unconditional Discharge.

  • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
    13·
    1 day ago

    Gun ownership is a federal restriction, so he can’t legally own a gun in any state.

    And yet he gets to control the nuclear football. WTactualF.

    • UltraGiGaGiganticEnglish
      2·
      7 hours ago

      Nuking the superbowl isn’t going to work as a false flag event. But you have to understand that these people aren’t playing with a full deck of cards and are trying to get a Royal Flush.

      Me neither, but at least I’m playing Uno.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      6·
      13 hours ago

      That could be a really interesting argument, actually. Strictly speaking, is there anything about “controlling a weapon” with the way the law is written? Or just about owning a gun? Or possession of a weapon? If someone, for example, handed a controller for an armed drone to a felon who could not have a gun, is that a loophole?

      Edit: thinking about this a little more and looking into it, the president is Commander in Chief of the military. The military does not generally allow felons, but there is a waiver for that. I think that if push came to shove, there could be a pathway there.

      • lordkuri@lemmy.world
        3·
        21 hours ago

        Strictly speaking, is there anything about “controlling a weapon” with the way the law is written? Or just about owning a gun? Or possession of a weapon? If someone, for example, handed a controller for an armed drone to a felon who could not have a gun, is that a loophole?

        It depends… how much money and how many slavish cult followers do you have?