• Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s taken completely out of context and you know it.

      It’s not calling for trans people to be eradicated, it’s calling for the current trans ideologies, where if you’re a girl who likes trucks you must be trans and therefore must be rushed on to puberty blockers and get your breast removed, to be eradicated.

      No one is calling for trans people to be eradicated as in “killed”. That’s what Nazis did - they literally killed people by the millions.

        • OceanSoap
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So you’re advocating for us to punish those who haven’t acted on or even spoken of committing trans-genocide because you think one day they might? You’re the evil government in Minority Report, literally.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No one is suggesting or calling for a genocide. It’s not happening. It’s not going to happen. You’re just fear mongering to try and paint people you don’t like as Nazis.

          I swear some of you want an actual genocide so you can go “see I told you!!!”

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I call a spade a spade ♠️. Ask a trans person what they think Knowles meant. You won’t. Because you know what they’d say. And you don’t care , because you assert your ignorance as truth.

            • OceanSoap
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              One Trans person isn’t going to have the same opinion as another. I can ask specific Trans people to get one answer, and others to get another. Will you accept the reply of a Trans person who disagrees with you? Or will you claim to be the arbitrator of all things Trans and claim they’re not *actually * trans?

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re splitting hairs about what “eradicate” means, it says a lot about what you’re happy to defend.

            And why.

            • OceanSoap
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s not the meaning of eradicate they’re splitting hairs about, it’s about what they want irradicated. Trans people are seperate from Trans ideology. You can be Trans and not agree with the ideology currently being pushed onto society.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not calling for trans people to be eradicated, it’s calling for the current trans ideologies

        I’d say this is a distinction without a difference, since both involve eradication of trans people from public life, but the latter involves eradication of the very idea that trans people exist. That’s worse.

        You’re being disingenuous. Then you move straight into the standard conservative bigoted lies which I’ll not quote.

        No one is calling for trans people to be eradicated as in “killed”.

        They absolutely are. Don’t insult people by expecting them to buy such hogwash.