Act of treason: Kim Jong-un's bizarre new ban for North Koreans
www.nzherald.co.nz
It's one of the most popular items around the world. Now it's banned in North Korea.

North Korea wants to ban corn dogs because of western decadence or something?! That’s horrible!

Let’s check out the sources.

According to reports, Kim has banned North Koreans from eating hotdogs as part of a crackdown on Western culture slowly oozing its way into the hermit nation.

“Reports”. Well, not super convincing so far…

According to Radio Free Asia (RFA), North Korea has also banned steamed rice cakes tteokbokki which is a popular street food in South Korea.

Oh hey, there we go, Radio Free Asia! What a great unbiased source/CIA front propaganda operation. Aren’t they the same people who said something like everyone in NK has to have their leader’s haircut? Or was forbidden to have his haircut? I think they said leather jackets were banned there once? Or that someone was executed for smuggling in Squid Game?

Food isn’t the only thing the hermit nation is cracking down on. Reports emerged in December that claim people who get divorced in North Korea are facing one to six months in labour camps for their “crimes”.

More “Reports”.

According to RFA, a divorced woman claimed she served three months of labour and said that women receive harsher sentences than the men.

So ya, it’s basically just RFA.

Beautiful.

  • ikilledtheradiostar [comrade/them, love/loves]@hexbear.netEnglish
    3·
    2 days ago

    has explanations on why Radio Free Asia sucks

    Prima facie. North Koreans do not speak a secret untranslatable language. If hot dogs were banned there would be documentation of it. This documentation would need to be mass disseminated so north Koreans know not to eat hot dogs. Surely a person telling a reporter that hot dogs were banned could also give them this document. CIA funding does not need to be shown to understand why RFA is garbage.

    • SevenSkalls [he/him]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
      3·
      2 days ago

      You’d think so, but mods in lemmy.world were apparently saying RFA is a legitimate source and are either independent, or they are part of the US government but it doesn’t matter because they still have a good history of journalism and check their facts. Then banning everyone who disagreed.

      I think they even used MFBC, which is hilarious once I read it. No failed fact checks for 5 years? How is that possible? And they report them as factual and left-leaning by taking two to three random stories? I thought everyone new RFA was biased as hell, but I shouldn’t under estimate US propaganda I guess.

      • ikilledtheradiostar [comrade/them, love/loves]@hexbear.netEnglish
        3·
        2 days ago

        Then I suppose just saying “wow RFA has quoted ‘some guy’ what excellent journalism”. Would be enough to point out how crap they are. Idk, trying to prove a source is untrustworthy is a fools errand since with some media literacy you can just see it. Once you have the eye the curtains are pulled back quickly. I would rather turbolibs get media literacy than them just dismissing RFA as the dumpster-fire it is.