Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1773arrow-down114cross-posted to: vivaldi_browservivaldi_browsernews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnologysysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1759arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square102fedilinkcross-posted to: vivaldi_browservivaldi_browsernews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnologysysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareshalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoBut that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0
But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0