There are few things quite as emblematic of late stage capitalism than the concept of “planned obsolescence”.

  • ddkman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weeell “bullshit” is easy to claim but not necessarily untrue. So with android phones this is definitely a problem. Industry wide firmware support for these ARM SOC-s are often ranging from not long enough, to fucking atrocious. You get basically two years of new drivers, and a security update maybe. The way LinageOS manages to support phones like the note 3, from like android 4, to 11, is basically creating manifests, that use drivers from newer, still supported, but “similar-ish” components. And the note 3 was a flagship device, easily the fastest phone of it’s generation. These Chromebooks, especially the ones schools can and do afford, are built to the penny. There is ultimately no point in pushing a software update to a device for a significant cost, that makes it so slow that no reasonable person would ever consider using it.

    What is the solution to this? Hard to say. Not buying hardware so incredibly obsolete that it has to run an alternate OS, is a start. Maybe just use PC-s and deploy linux.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      The solution is to let people use the device in any way they want and can. Software should not dictate hardware obsolescence.

      • blindsight@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If I’m reading this correctly (and you need to read between the lines a bit), it’s not that they literally don’t work, it’s that they aren’t capable of getting security updates. For playing Minecraft, who cares, but schools are legally obligated to keep private student information (like all their schoolwork) secure.

        It’s not like there’s a LineageOS for Chromebooks and standardized firmware and drivers that can be easily deployed and updated. They mentioned in the article that open source alternatives were trialed, but that they lacked needed features and were very costly (in time, presumably) to get working.

        This is just a shit sandwich all around.

        From another perspective, several schools I’ve worked at have had so much vandalism and theft of Chromebooks that they won’t even consider replacing them with more costly future-proof tech. It doesn’t matter if they get 8 years of software support if students break most of them in years 1-3.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not like there’s a LineageOS for Chromebooks and standardized firmware and drivers that can be easily deployed and updated. They mentioned in the article that open source alternatives were trialed, but that they lacked needed features and were very costly (in time, presumably) to get working.

          You can run Linux on them, it’s the cost of getting a bunch of shitty ass chromebooks done that’s not worth it for schools.

        • fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is exactly the issue for me. Devices used by 10-18 yo students do not last 10 years, and so it doesn’t matter if they get software support for that long.

          My 12 y/o has gone through 3 Chromebooks since the pandemic, but they are $50 refurbished so who cares

          Edit I have a gaming rig, and he uses the GeForce cloud gaming service on his Chromebook, and he loads into Fortnite faster than I do when we play duos

      • ddkman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        But they kinda sorta do. It is not like Chromebooks are locked down like an iPhone. I had an old Samsung Chromebook, you could just turn off trusted boot with a flick of a switch (okay it did reset your device), and just run what you wanted. It’s just with arm based stuff running what you want is not trivial. You run what you can which is often nothing.

      • CalcProgrammer1
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also the ARM vendors need to get their shit together and make useful hardware abstraction layers so they don’t have to tailor their OS and driver suite to a particular chip.

        But no, there’s no profit motive for keeping older chips alive. They enjoy being able to ship a proprietary blob that only works on one generation of chip and then forget about ever updating it again.

        However, the Linux ARM community (mostly driven by reverse engineering and community efforts, not the companies making these chips) have shown that you absolutely can have a sane kernel, driver, and OS setup on ARM hardware. Mobile Linux is getting good because we have proper ARM Linux drivers like panfrost and freedreno now. Work is being done to standardize mobile camera hardware with libcamera.

        The big corps could’ve made these frameworks, they could’ve upstreamed their ARM drivers in mainline Linux so that the maintenance burden was lessened. They didn’t, and then they whine about how difficult it is to maintain old devices. It’s entirely a burden of their own making.

        Meanwhile my PinePhone, running on an ancient Allwinner A64 SoC from 2015 with a GPU core from 2010 or so, is running the latest Linux 6.4 kernel with a fully updated stack. Thank you Linux community for doing what the shitty corps could not.